簡單來說，本文見解就機器人高科技動物之法律責任歸屬問題，欲分成兩個責任階段去探討，一為前階段之設計生產機器人的法律責任，二為後階段之使用機器人的法律責任，運用意思表示之構成要件，除可限定它適用設計製造者對物之瑕疵責任範圍外；可定性機器人的行為性質，並分析它與使用者間之法律關係，進而推論出機器人使用者應類推適用特殊法律行為之法律監管責任型態。
Intelligent autonomous robot is between human being and objects, regard it as the outcome can analyze its automatic activity with high-technology. To explore its behavior is belong legal act or the fact of law, try to break through the traditional law that define the responsibilities and conceptions for objects According to some robot behaviors, we should be determined who must be management supervisor that have to afford risk and damage for maintaining the balance between the development and the new technologies.
Along with the artificial intelligence technology is more and more complicated, it may produce some challenge for manufacturers devise and handling instructions. The robot will be complicated high-tech animals, if it widely used for human, it will be essential for its necessary warning and correct instruction for use that makes the designers should afford the duty of flaw with their robots. And then the robot will coexist with human being to society. Contrary to the behavior of the robot, we should plan a series of rigors to robots, in order to construct completely the regulatory responsibility system.
In simple terms, this article views on the legal liability of high-tech robots attribution, responsibility is divided into two phases want to explore, a liability for the pre-design stage of production robots, two for a later stage of the liability using the robot, using elements of the intention, it applies in addition to defining the outer design flaw was the responsibility of the manufacturer of the range; nature of the behavior can be characterized robot, and analyze its relationship between the user and the law, and then infer the user should apply by analogy special robot legal acts of regulatory responsibility.
