文化大學機構典藏 CCUR:Item 987654321/35790
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  全文笔数/总笔数 : 46833/50693 (92%)
造访人次 : 11853880      在线人数 : 464
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜寻范围 查询小技巧:
  • 您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号",以获取较精准的检索结果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜寻,建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段,可获得较完整数据
  • 进阶搜寻
    主页登入上传说明关于CCUR管理 到手机版


    jsp.display-item.identifier=請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://irlib.pccu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/35790


    题名: 機器人相關法律問題之研究
    The Research of Robot Related Regal Issue
    作者: 吳璠
    贡献者: 法律學系
    关键词: 自主性機器人
    權利主體
    機器人法律
    科技法律
    侵權行為
    事實行為
    法律行為
    社會發展
    監管責任
    商品責任
    意思表示
    日期: 2016
    上传时间: 2017-04-07 14:17:36 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 智慧型自主機器人係介於人與物的中間性質,將其視為一種高科技動物,並對其自主性之行為進一步作屬性分析,探究它的行為是屬於法律行為或者是事實行為,試著突破過去法律,所定義對物之責任及觀念。針對機器人有的行為,判斷何者應為監管者之角色,維持新科技發展的平衡關係和何者應對機器人的侵權行為損害承擔風險。

      隨著人工智慧技術的複雜化,很可能使製造設計者在設計上和警告說明的方面產生挑戰。機器人將是複雜的高科技產物,如果它們被人類廣泛使用,必要的警告和正確的使用說明將不可或缺,讓設計製造者對其所研發的機器人,負有機器人程式之瑕疵責任;再者機器人將與人類共存於社會中,針對機器人之行為,規劃上必須對使用機器人者,規劃一定之資格考核,才能架構完整的監管責任體系。

      簡單來說,本文見解就機器人高科技動物之法律責任歸屬問題,欲分成兩個責任階段去探討,一為前階段之設計生產機器人的法律責任,二為後階段之使用機器人的法律責任,運用意思表示之構成要件,除可限定它適用設計製造者對物之瑕疵責任範圍外;可定性機器人的行為性質,並分析它與使用者間之法律關係,進而推論出機器人使用者應類推適用特殊法律行為之法律監管責任型態。
    Intelligent autonomous robot is between human being and objects, regard it as the outcome can analyze its automatic activity with high-technology. To explore its behavior is belong legal act or the fact of law, try to break through the traditional law that define the responsibilities and conceptions for objects According to some robot behaviors, we should be determined who must be management supervisor that have to afford risk and damage for maintaining the balance between the development and the new technologies.

    Along with the artificial intelligence technology is more and more complicated, it may produce some challenge for manufacturers devise and handling instructions. The robot will be complicated high-tech animals, if it widely used for human, it will be essential for its necessary warning and correct instruction for use that makes the designers should afford the duty of flaw with their robots. And then the robot will coexist with human being to society. Contrary to the behavior of the robot, we should plan a series of rigors to robots, in order to construct completely the regulatory responsibility system.

    In simple terms, this article views on the legal liability of high-tech robots attribution, responsibility is divided into two phases want to explore, a liability for the pre-design stage of production robots, two for a later stage of the liability using the robot, using elements of the intention, it applies in addition to defining the outer design flaw was the responsibility of the manufacturer of the range; nature of the behavior can be characterized robot, and analyze its relationship between the user and the law, and then infer the user should apply by analogy special robot legal acts of regulatory responsibility.
    显示于类别:[法律學系暨法律學研究所] 博碩士論文

    文件中的档案:

    档案 描述 大小格式浏览次数
    index.html0KbHTML169检视/开启


    在CCUR中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.


    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回馈