文化大學機構典藏 CCUR:Item 987654321/30948
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 46867/50733 (92%)
造訪人次 : 11889581      線上人數 : 442
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧:
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號",以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋,建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位,可獲得較完整資料
  • 進階搜尋
    主頁登入上傳說明關於CCUR管理 到手機版


    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://irlib.pccu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/30948


    題名: 王弼與郭象仁義觀的比較研究
    A Comparative Study of Wang Bi and Guo Xiang's Benevolence and Righteousness Theory
    作者: 陳佩君
    Chen, Pei-Chun
    貢獻者: 哲學系
    關鍵詞: 王弼
    郭象
    仁義
    名教
    人性
    Wang Bi
    Guo Xiang
    Benevolence and Righteousness
    Confucian Ethical Codes
    Human Nature
    日期: 2013-12
    上傳時間: 2015-11-13 16:19:30 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 儒家主張仁義為名教的核心價值,在道家卻有「絕仁棄義」之批判,立場迴異。若欲調和儒道、消解自然與名教的衝突,如何通切地詮釋「仁義」,實為玄學家不能迴避的課題。本文先分別探討王弼與郭象的仁義觀與本體、人性、名教的關係,繼而解析其仁義概念的內涵,最後再就兩家的仁義觀進行綜合比較與評述。
    While Confucianism regarded benevolence and righteousness as the essence of Confucian Ethical Codes, Daoism claimed ”abandon benevolence and discard righteousness.” In order to dissolve the conflict between Confucianism and Daoism, nature and Confucian Ethical Codes, Neo-Daoists need to find a proper approach to interpret the concept ”benevolence and righteousness.” In the first place, this paper studies Wang Bi and Guo Xiang's benevolence and righteousness theory separately. First, inquire their thoughts about the relationships between ”benevolence and righteousness” and substance, human nature, and Confucian Ethical Codes. Second, analyze their definitions of ”benevolence and righteousness.” In the end, this paper makes a comparative study of Wang Bi and Guo Xiang's benevolence and righteousness theory.
    關聯: 哲學與文化 ; 40卷12期 (2013 / 12 / 01) , P75 - 93
    顯示於類別:[哲學系暨研究所] 期刊論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 描述 大小格式瀏覽次數
    index.html0KbHTML226檢視/開啟


    在CCUR中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋