文化大學機構典藏 CCUR:Item 987654321/30948
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  全文笔数/总笔数 : 46867/50733 (92%)
造访人次 : 11885955      在线人数 : 255
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜寻范围 查询小技巧:
  • 您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号",以获取较精准的检索结果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜寻,建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段,可获得较完整数据
  • 进阶搜寻
    主页登入上传说明关于CCUR管理 到手机版


    jsp.display-item.identifier=請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://irlib.pccu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/30948


    题名: 王弼與郭象仁義觀的比較研究
    A Comparative Study of Wang Bi and Guo Xiang's Benevolence and Righteousness Theory
    作者: 陳佩君
    Chen, Pei-Chun
    贡献者: 哲學系
    关键词: 王弼
    郭象
    仁義
    名教
    人性
    Wang Bi
    Guo Xiang
    Benevolence and Righteousness
    Confucian Ethical Codes
    Human Nature
    日期: 2013-12
    上传时间: 2015-11-13 16:19:30 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 儒家主張仁義為名教的核心價值,在道家卻有「絕仁棄義」之批判,立場迴異。若欲調和儒道、消解自然與名教的衝突,如何通切地詮釋「仁義」,實為玄學家不能迴避的課題。本文先分別探討王弼與郭象的仁義觀與本體、人性、名教的關係,繼而解析其仁義概念的內涵,最後再就兩家的仁義觀進行綜合比較與評述。
    While Confucianism regarded benevolence and righteousness as the essence of Confucian Ethical Codes, Daoism claimed ”abandon benevolence and discard righteousness.” In order to dissolve the conflict between Confucianism and Daoism, nature and Confucian Ethical Codes, Neo-Daoists need to find a proper approach to interpret the concept ”benevolence and righteousness.” In the first place, this paper studies Wang Bi and Guo Xiang's benevolence and righteousness theory separately. First, inquire their thoughts about the relationships between ”benevolence and righteousness” and substance, human nature, and Confucian Ethical Codes. Second, analyze their definitions of ”benevolence and righteousness.” In the end, this paper makes a comparative study of Wang Bi and Guo Xiang's benevolence and righteousness theory.
    關聯: 哲學與文化 ; 40卷12期 (2013 / 12 / 01) , P75 - 93
    显示于类别:[哲學系暨研究所] 期刊論文

    文件中的档案:

    档案 描述 大小格式浏览次数
    index.html0KbHTML225检视/开启


    在CCUR中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.


    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回馈