| 摘要: | 本研究主要的目的是從社會文化脈絡的觀點下，了解一個台灣家暴家庭經歷哪些家暴危機事件，及其各自的觀點與詮釋，以及探討此家暴家庭之家庭韌力。本研究問題有：(一)探討此暴力家庭經歷哪些家暴危機事件，其各自的觀點與詮釋。(二)探討此暴力家庭之家庭韌力，包括1.探討此暴力家庭之家庭信念系統。2.探討此暴力家庭之家庭組織模式。3.探討此暴力家庭之溝通/問題解決歷程。
本研究以一個家暴家庭之母親和成年未婚單身之女兒，共三人為受訪者，以質性研究取向進行兩階段訪談蒐集資料，資料分析採內容分析法。研究結果為：
（一）家暴共計10件，可歸為三期，1.家暴前期：以精神虐待為主；2.家暴中期：以肢體暴力和精神虐待交互出現為主；3.家暴嚴重期：以精神虐待、性虐待、身體暴力三者共存性為主。由於各期家暴壓力源不同，並與家庭有效韌力因子之交互作用，各期有不同的主觀經驗與詮釋。
（二）本研究以Walsh家庭韌力理論為分類之類目，發現受訪者家庭共有110個韌力因子，歸屬於30組有效韌力元素之下，即共有46個有效韌力因子，較Walsh的家庭韌力理論少8個有效韌力因子，即找出各種可能性、更大的價值和目的、尊重個體的差異、修復破裂的關係、容忍差異、避免責備、公平互惠地協商、汲取過去的成功經驗。110個韌力因子中有13個韌力因子與社會文化脈絡有關，即家人一體感、家人患難與共、順天知命、不完整家庭的重新認定、維持完整的家庭、維持家庭形式的完整、母職責任感、忍耐自抑、顧面子、愛的含蓄表達、犧牲小我，完成大我、維持表面的和諧、母親不離不棄的承諾。有關家暴家庭之家庭韌力，分為三個部分：
1.家庭之信念系統：賦予逆境意義、正向觀點、超越與靈性三部分。
2. 家庭之家庭組織模式：彈性、家人連結、社會與經濟資源等三部分。
3. 家庭之溝通/問題解決歷程：清晰、開放的情感表達和共同合作解決問題。
(三)依據研究結果，本研究提出對諮商輔導工作上的建議。
The main purpose of this research is from the view of the social and culture context to understand a Taiwan's Domestic Violence Family (DVF) which went through cruel critical incidents and violent, and one's own views and interpretations, thus to investigate the resilience potential of this Domestic Violence Family (DVF). These researched questions were:
1. to probe into the Domestic Violence Family how many cruel critical incidents did it go through, one's own view and annotation explanatory note.
2. to probe into the resilience potential of this DVF, including as:
(1) To probe into the family faith systems of this DVF.
(2) The organization model of the family.
(3) The process of the communication/problem-solving of the family.
This research was with the two single daughters and their mother of the DVF, all three were interviewees. The method used in this study was qualitative and the data collected in two stages interviews that were analyzed with content-analysis system. The main findings were as follows：
1.The 10 violence incidents were attributed to three stages：
(1) prelude stage: mostly emotional or psychological abuse.
(2) middle stage: physical violence and emotional abuse emerged mainly interactive.
(3) aggravated stage: coexistence of the psychological abuse, sexual abuse and, physical violence.
Since the period of cohabitation of different stressors, and family resilience factors of effective interaction there are different phases of the subjective experience and interpretation.
2, Based on the theory of Walsh family resilience, 110 resilience factors were found in this subject family, 46 of them are affiliate to 30 groups of effective resilience elements; 8 factors less than those of Walsh theory; namely: master the possible, larger values/ purpose, respect individual differences, seek reconciliation of wounded relationships, tolerance for difference, avoid blaming, negotiation of fairness and reciprocity, build on success. 13 of the 110 resilience factors are related to social culture context resilience factors: be a family's integrative sense, to recognize the incomplete family, be content with what one is, to maintain a formally complete family, be a responsible mother, be self-restraint, be sensitive about one’s reputation, to sacrifice oneself for the society, to keep external harmony, the mother’s promise of never deserting. The family potential for resilience was divided into three parts:
(1) Family belief system: make meaning of adversity, positive outlook, and transcendence and spirituality.
(2) Family organization model: flexibility, family connectedness, and social and economic resources.
(3) Family communication/ problem-solving process: clarity, open emotional expression and collaborative problem-solving.
3. Based on the results of the study, some suggestions for counseling were given. |
