| 摘要: | 自民國七十一年《文化資產保存法》公佈施行後，許多具有歷史空間價值的建築物被指定為涵有文化和歷史意義的古蹟，並且受到法律的保護。由於我國社會和經濟的快速變遷之下，在歷史空間的保存與維護工作上是一種動態過程，而不是凍結式的保存。經由古蹟保存思潮的演變下，古蹟再利用的觀點因應而生，且有助於古蹟的長久保存。對於古蹟而言無論面臨何種再利用形式，其新面貌不應該與過往不同或是違反當初的保存目的，而這其中保存的意義在於讓下一世代的人們有機會得以瞭解曾經發生過的痕跡。但是，由於政府對於古蹟再利用的鼓勵與促進，卻沒有訂立明確的規範措施之下，雖然同時新的再利用對於保存與維護古蹟的詮釋顯示出各種不同新思維，卻也造成許多古蹟場所面臨實驗性的再利用。本研究主旨在針對參觀古蹟再利用個案後之民眾，作為檢測古蹟保存目的與古蹟再利用兩者間的差異，以及是否能讓下一世代的人們理解古蹟的發展歷程。
本研究透過文獻回顧中探究各類型古蹟再利用形式與古蹟保存意涵因子，再藉由古蹟再利用形式個案觀察瞭解其特性，以及透過現況的實地觀察與問卷訪談，再輔以統計相關性分析的檢測研究，作為檢測古蹟保存目的與古蹟再利用兩者間的關連性。研究發現不同的再利用形式(單一靜態展示與複合式發展)對於理解保存意涵的程度確實具有差異性，此外「民眾的地域性」 (在地居民和外地遊客)、「參觀頻率」、「參觀前是否已知古蹟相關資訊」以及「古蹟資訊的得知管道來源」等因素皆會影響參觀者（參觀古蹟後）對於古蹟保存意涵的瞭解程度，因此本研究建議未來古蹟再利用形式面向上應明確訂定相關定論與措施，以作為有利於古蹟保存的永續發展。
Many valuable historical spaces and structures are designated as Cultural and Historic Heritage Sites so that they are protected by the formal political power, since passing Cultural Heritage Conservation Law in 1982 and being executed. With the rapid changes of our economy and society, the work of historic preservation and conservation is a dynamic process and it definitely is not static. The new concept of heritage adaptive-reuse, much more guaranteed in sustainable preservation, was evolved from the old idea of protecting historic assets as national monuments. Here, whatever kind of adaptive-reuses of the historic sites are, their new looks should not be different/against with its original purpose of conservation/preservation so that new generations have opportunities to realize what had happened before. However, with the encouragement from the government for the heritage adaptive reuse and without well-defined regulations, many new usages of historic sites are experimental, although the new usages show various new idea of conservation/preservation at the same time.
This study aims to examine the difference between conservation/preservation purpose and adaptive-reuse based on visitors after their visiting the heritages, and to understand whether the new generations are able to realize the historic evolutions.
Through literature review for understanding the types of heritage adaptive-reuses and conservation/preservation purposes and defining key research factors, field survey for recognizing the exiting usage, and questionnaire and statistical analyses for checking the differences between conservation/preservation purpose and adaptive-reuse, this study finds that different types of heritage adaptive reuse (Exhibition's interpretation vs. Mixed interpretive media) do affect different degrees of understanding original conservation/preservation purposes. Moreover, "visitor types (tourists or residents)," "revisiting times", "ability of obtaining interpretive information before visiting," and "the way of obtaining interpretive media" are closely associated with whether visitors (after visiting the historic sites) are able to understand the original conservation/preservation purposes. The study concludes that there is a need to define types of heritage adaptive-reuses carefully, so that conservation/preservation purposes are able to recognize by the visitors easily. |
