| 摘要: | 本研究目的在探究六頂思考帽書寫對情緒調控的效果。本研究採用單因子設計，自變項是為訓練組別，分為三個水準（六頂思考帽組、認知再評估組，及控制組），依變項為參與者的正向情緒、負向情緒、正向思考、負向思考及中性思考。本研究邀請120位參與者參與研究。研究程序區分為三個階段。第一階段以網路研究形式製作「六頂思考帽組」、「認知再評估組」及「控制組」等三組訓練網路連結，並邀請參與者自行選擇一組訓練網路連結。第二階段則讓已選擇訓練連結的參與者接受促發負向情緒之描述作業，然後，進行分別進行各組之訓練。六頂思考帽組訓練參與者六頂思考帽技術並練習運用；認知再評估組訓練參與者認知再評估技巧並練習運用；控制組則訓練無關情緒調控效果的內容與練習。第三階段是各組完成訓練後，請參與者填寫正負向情感量表，及思考產生作業。研究結果發現，情緒調控效果方面，正向情緒部分，六頂思考帽組、認知再評估組及控制組等三組之間未有顯著差異；負向情緒部分，六頂思考帽組、認知再評估組及控制組之間同樣未有顯著差異。思考指標效果方面，六頂思考帽組、認知再評估組及控制組等三組在正向思考指標上未有顯著差異；負向思考部分，六頂思考組顯著低於認知再評估組，且六頂思考組顯著低於控制組，而認知再評估組與控制組等兩組之間未呈現差異；中性思考部分，六頂思考帽組、認知再評估組及控制組等以上三組未呈現顯著差異。上述結果顯示，經過六頂思考帽訓練的個體會降低負向思考之程度。本研究之結果意涵將在討論中加以論述，作為未來探討六頂思考帽書寫訓練與應用之參考。
This study will use single-factor experimental design to explores the effects of six thinking hats on emotional regulation. The independent variable is divided into three levels, which are six thinking hats group, cognitive reappraisal group, and control group; the dependent variable is the effects of emotional regulation which are positive emotion, negative emotions, positive thinking, negative thinking, and neutral thinking. One hundred and twenty volunteers were invited to participate in this study. There are three phases of the research. In the first phase, three training links, including the Six Thinking Hats Group, Cognitive Reappraisal Group, Control Group, were created in the form of network research, and participants were invited to choose a training link of their own. In the second stage, participants who had selected the training link were given the negative emotion promotion, and then each group was trained separately. The Six Thinking Hats group trained participants in the six thinking hats technique and then conducts exercises; the Cognitive Reassessment group trained participants in the cognitive reassessment technique and then conducts exercises; the control group trained participants in non-emotional regulation technique and then conducts exercises. In the third stage, after each group completed the training, the participants filled out the PANAS and the Thought-listing Task. The results showed that there was no significant difference between the Six Thinking Hats group, the Cognitive Reassessment group and the control group for positive emotions, and no significant difference between the Six Thinking Hats group, the Cognitive Reassessment group and the control group for negative emotions. In terms of increasing positive thinking, there was no significant difference between the Six Thinking Hats group, the Cognitive Reassessment group and the control group; in terms of decreasing negative thinking, the Six Thinking Hats group was significantly lower than the Cognitive Reassessment group, and the Six Thinking Hats group was significantly lower than the control group, while there was no difference between the Cognitive Reassessment group and the control group; in terms of increasing neutral thinking, there was no significant difference between the Six Thinking Hats group, the Cognitive Reassessment group and the control group. The above results show that individuals trained with the six thinking caps reduce the level of negative thinking. The results of this study will be used as a reference for future research on the Six Thinking Hats training. |
