全球治理與國家治理間價值衝突之研究：臺灣與紐西蘭原住民政策的比較分析

文化大學機構典藏 CCUR > 社會科學院 > 國家發展與與中國大陸研究所碩博士班 > 博碩士論文 > Item 987654321/51847

請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://irlib.pccu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/51847

題名:	全球治理與國家治理間價值衝突之研究：臺灣與紐西蘭原住民政策的比較分析 Value Conflict between Global Governance and National Governance: A Comparative Analysis of the Aboriginal Peoples' Policies in Taiwan and New Zealand
作者:	李以珍
貢獻者:	國家發展與中國大陸研究所國家發展組
關鍵詞:	全球化公共政策政治系統論原住民 globalization public policy Political System Theory indigenous people
日期:	2022
上傳時間:	2023-03-24 11:24:05 (UTC+8)
摘要:	近年由於全球化之內涵與發展持續不斷深化，各國政府面臨國家公共政策向全球化潮流與調適挑戰的各種課題，因此，如何與全球治理規範接軌，以推動公共政策與治理實踐走向全球化面向之研究將成為未來學術發展趨勢。筆者觀察到，近年來原住民議題受到國際與國內各界高度關注，不僅聯合國早在2007年通過《聯合國原住民權利宣言》表達對原住民權益的重視，我國亦積極制定各項保障原住民權利政策邁向全球化發展，並探索相關問題朝向國家治理與全球治理的接軌。然而，我國及相關國家原住民政策的產出，是否和全球治理的大環境作出良性互動，並符合《聯合國原住民權利宣言》宗旨，卻是值得探索的課題。因此，本文運用David Easton的「政治系統論」作為分析的理論基礎，同時以宣言中原住民五大權利，即自救、自保、自主、自治及自決權的分類進行討論，以比較與檢驗我國與紐西蘭政府在全球治理與國內治理的框架下，兩國原住民政策治理運作中相互調適的異同。在David Easton的「政治系統論」架構下，筆者將全文共分十章，第一章，說明研究動機及學術貢獻；第二章，從規範性、經驗性與價值性等三個研究途徑進行文獻回顧；第三章，闡明本文研究設計與主要架構；第四章，從全球治理之視角來看全球化下的原住民權利規範；第五至九章，探索兩國原住民生存環境之異同、社會投入因素、原住民政策制定轉換過程、原住民政策產出與治理，以及相關政策回饋比較，第十章，提出發現與研究建議。 In recent years, due to the continuous development of globalization, countries are faced with various challenges toward the national public policy adjustments based on global development. The work to promote the development of public policy under globalization will become the main academic research trend in near future. This dissertation has widely observed this trend mainly focusing the issue of global governance and national governance with the emphasis on the public policies on indigenous peoples in the world. As far as the global governance is concerned the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples （UNDRIP） which was made as early as 2007 has been seen as a typical model. As for the national governance, manly nations also enacted laws and regulations on indigenous policy following the UNDRIP. This dissertation is trying to make a comparative research on Taiwan and New Zealand to explore the difference under the direction and guidance of the UNDRIP. With regard to the theoretical basis, this dissertation uses David Easton’s " Political System Theory " as the constructional formulation. This writer is trying to discuss the classification of the five major rights of the indigenous people, namely, self-saving rights, self-protection rights, autonomy rights, ownership rights and self-determination rights, with the aim to compare the similarities and differences between the two countries’ aboriginal policy on governance operations. Under the framework of David Easton’s " Political System Theory ", the whole dissertation is divided into ten chapters as follows: Chapter one explains the research motivation and academic contribution. Chapter Two is a literature review with the emphasis on research approaches of normative, empirical, and value-based research. Chapter Three is to clarify the research design and main analysis framework of this dissertation. Chapter Four explores the UNDRIP with the major concern on the structure on global governance and national governance. Chapter Five to Chapter Nine explore the major subjects on the Environment of Indigenous Peoples in Taiwan and New Zealand as well as the comparison of the two countries’ aboriginal policy input factors, policy-making transformation process, policy implementation, policy feedback, etc.. Chapter Ten presents the findings and research recommendations.
顯示於類別:	[國家發展與與中國大陸研究所碩博士班] 博碩士論文

文件中的檔案:

檔案	描述	大小	格式	瀏覽次數
index.html		0Kb	HTML	161	檢視/開啟

檢視Licence

在CCUR中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.

資料載入中.....