傳聞法則於臺灣司法實務應用之研究－以徐自強案被告以外之人於偵查中所為之陳述為中心

CCUR > College of Law > Department of Law & Graduate Institute of Law > thesis > Item 987654321/51666

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://irlib.pccu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/51666

Title:	傳聞法則於臺灣司法實務應用之研究－以徐自強案被告以外之人於偵查中所為之陳述為中心 Research on the Implementation of Hearsay Rule in Taiwan Judicial Practice - Focusing on the Statements Made in the Investigation Stage by the Persons Other than the Defendants in Hsu, Tzu-Chiang Case
Authors:	陳柏宇
Contributors:	法律學系
Keywords:	傳聞法則交互詰問徐自強案臺灣刑事訴訟法美國聯邦證據規則日本刑事訴訟法 Hearsay Rule Cross-Examination Hsu, Tzu-Chiang Case Code of Criminal Procedure in Taiwan U.S. Federal Rules of Evidence Code of Criminal Procedure in Japan
Date:	2022
Issue Date:	2023-03-16 14:32:04 (UTC+8)
Abstract:	臺灣刑事訴訟制度於2003年修訂後，採改良式當事人進行主義，亦引入傳聞法則及交互詰問等相關規定。惟臺灣傳聞法則並未徹底將英美法之傳聞法則引入，導致臺灣傳聞法則不僅傳聞與非傳聞難以區隔，傳聞例外之事由更有過之而無不及，以致於刑事訴訟案件中，諸多被告以外之人於審判外之陳述，毋庸經被告為對質詰問，即具有證據能力，與傳聞法則之意旨可謂反其道而行。其中，尤以被告以外之人於偵查中所為之陳述最甚。　　本論文係以臺灣傳聞法則例外規定之一部，即被告以外之人於偵查中所為之陳述與美國、日本相關規定為比較法制，並將臺灣社會矚目重大訴訟案件－徐自強案之案件經過、歷審開庭紀錄、答辯狀及判決書等案卷為整理，並探討臺灣刑事訴訟法第159條之1第2項至第159條之3之適用情況，繼而試以徐自強案為臺灣與美國、日本規定之交錯，亦即試探將徐自強案置於美國、日本之證據法則下，判斷該案中被告以外之人於偵查中所為之陳述之證據資料是否得通過美國、日本傳聞法則之檢驗，作為本案之證據，使法院據以為作成判決之依據。　　綜上所述，本論文不僅以傳聞法則例外規定之理論基礎探討臺灣司法實務應用之現況，進而分析臺灣現行法制是否有改良之空間，並以修法建議為修正或補強臺灣傳聞法則之規定與規範密度作為結論。企以提供未來立法者修法之參考，藉以使臺灣司法實務使用本法則之操作得以更細膩，以維護人民接受公平審判程序之權利。 Taiwan (R.O.C.) had been using the Refined Adversary System in its litigation system of criminal procedure in 2003, also imported the Hearsay Rule and Cross-Examination. Since the adoption of the Hearsay Rule in the criminal proceeding of Taiwan (R.O.C.) only has a quite short history, how the Rule and its exceptions should be applied so the evidence against the defendant could be more properly used in order to make the accused enjoy the right to a fair trial needs to be much more clarified. This thesis probed into research on the implementation in judicial practice of the statements made in the investigation stage by a person other than the accused through all the judicial documents since the very beginning of Hsu, Tzu-Chiang Case, which was one of the high-profile criminal cases between 1990s and 2010s in Taiwan (R.O.C.). The thesis also compared the differences in using the Hearsay Rule to exclude the hearsay evidence, such as the official records of oral statements made in the investigation stage by a person other than the accused, between Taiwan (R.O.C.), the United States federal and Japan. In conclusion, this thesis not only analyzed the implementation in judicial practice through the theoretical foundation of the exception of Hearsay Rule but also tried to find out if there were any inadequacy on current provision. The views and legal grounds of this thesis were offered as reference.
Appears in Collections:	[Department of Law & Graduate Institute of Law ] thesis

Files in This Item:

File	Description	Size	Format
index.html		0Kb	HTML	163	View/Open

View Licence

Loading...