文化大學機構典藏 CCUR:Item 987654321/51561
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 46867/50733 (92%)
Visitors : 11881775      Online Users : 598
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://irlib.pccu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/51561


    Title: 西歐商業銀行與合作銀行成本效率之比較分析 -兼論ESG對商業銀行效率之影響
    A Comparative Analysis of Cost Efficiency between Western European Commercial Banks and Cooperative Banks with ESG Impact on Commercial Bank Efficiency
    Authors: 鍾孟耘
    Contributors: 財務金融學系
    Keywords: 企業社會責任
    環境
    社會
    治理
    成本效率
    隨機邊界法
    隨機共同邊界法
    Corporate Social Responsibility
    Environment
    Social
    Governance
    Cost Efficiency
    Stochastic Frontier Analysis
    Stochastic Metafrontier Approach
    Date: 2022
    Issue Date: 2023-03-14 13:59:20 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 環境(environment, E)、社會(social, S)與治理(governance, G)為永續性發展指標,代表一個國家對永續發展的重視程度,進而影響銀行的商業模式與永續性的落實。因此,本研究以西歐國家銀行為例,探討商業銀行與合作銀行成本效率之差異,並進一步針對商業銀行分析ESG對銀行成本效率之影響。本研究對象包括德國、法國、荷蘭以及比利時,研究期間為2010年到2020年。首先利用隨機邊界法(stochastic frontier analysis, SFA),探討逾期放款比率、資本適足率、淨利息邊際、成本收入比率以及流動性比率對其銀行成本效率之影響;接著採用隨機共同邊界法(stochastic metafrontier approach, SMF)估計商業銀行與合作銀行之共同成本邊際函數,求算技術缺口比率(technology gap ratio, TGR)及共同成本效率(metafrontier cost efficiency, MCE)。此外,並納入環境(E)、社會(S)、治理(G)分析其對商業銀行成本效率之影響。本文研究結果顯示,無論在成本效率(CE)、技術缺口比率(TGR)或共同成本效率(MCE),合作銀行均較商業銀行更有效率,表示在2010年歐債危機發生時,商業銀行受到較大的衝擊,因此合作銀行較商業銀行來得更有效率;而商業銀行進行E、S、G活動,反而會降低其成本效率。

    Environmental (E), social (S), and governance (G) are indicators of sustainable development. It represents the degree of importance a country places on sustainable development, which in turn affects the implementation of a bank’s business model and sustainability. Therefore, this study examines the difference in cost efficiency between commercial banks and cooperative banks, employing banks in Western Europe as an example, and further examines the impact of ESG on cost efficiency of commercial banks. The study covers Germany, France, the Netherlands, and Belgium, and the study period is from 2010 to 2020. First, stochastic frontier analysis (SFA) is employed to examine the impact of non-performing loans ratio, capital adequacy ratio, net interest margin, cost-to-income ratio, and liquidity ratio on the cost efficiency of commercial banks and cooperative banks. Then, the stochastic metafrontier approach (SMF) is used to estimate the meta-cost function between commercial banks and cooperative banks, and to calculate the technology gap ratio (TGR) and metafrontier cost efficiency (MCE). In addition, E, S, G is included to analyze its impact on cost efficiency of commercial banks. The results show that cooperative banks are better than commercial banks in terms of cost efficiency (CE), technical gap ratio (TGR), and metafrontier cost efficiency (MCE). The results show that commercial banks were hit harder by the 2010 European debt crisis and cooperative banks are more efficient than commercial banks, and commercial banks can reduce their cost efficiency by conducting E, S and G activities.
    Appears in Collections:[Department of Banking & Finance ] Thesis

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML259View/Open


    All items in CCUR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback