本研究目欲探討「嘲笑風格」與「復原力」之相關，及「調節焦點」調節嘲笑風格與復原力相關之效果。研究方法採滾雪球抽樣之形式，透過問卷於社交媒體上進行資料的蒐集，問卷內容包含「嘲笑風格量表」、「簡版復原力量表」，及「調節焦點量表」共三份量表，研究參與者為18-26 歲的大學生，總問卷數332人，有效問卷為252 份，占總問卷數75.9%。在統計法上使用相關法與階層迴歸進行分析。結果支持怕被笑與復原力呈現顯著負相關，然而喜被笑與復原力之相關未達顯著正相關，喜笑人與復原力之負相關未獲得支持。在調節焦點調節嘲笑風格與復原力之相關上皆未能產生預測效果。此外，研究亦發現調節焦點之促進焦點與預防焦點都對復原力有直接解釋的效果，促進焦點與復原力呈現正相關，預防焦點與復原力呈現負相關。本研究有助了解嘲笑風格與復原力的關係，及調節焦點與復原力的關係，以提供未來相關研究的參考。
The main purpose was to discuss the relationship between “Pho-Phi-Kat” and “Resilience”, and “Regulatory Focus” was taken as moderator to examine the effects. The method of this study used the form of snowball sampling, and collecting data by questionnaire on social media. The content of the questionnaire was composed of three scales, “PhoPhiKat-TC Scale”, “Brief Resilience Scale” and “Regulatory Focus Scale”. Participants were college students ranged from 18-26 years old, 332 people for all, 252 as valid, account for 75.9% of all the sample. In statistical analysis, Pearson correlation and hierarchical regression analysis were performed on the data to examine the hypothesis. The result supported the negative relationship between gelotophobia and resilience. However, the positive relationship between gelotophilia and resilience were not achieved significantly. The negative relationship between katagelasticism and resilience were not supported. Regulatory Focus didn’t explain the moderating effects. Furthermore, the research had also found that both the promotion focus and prevention focus of regulatory focus have the main effect to resilience directly. The promotion focus can positively predict resilience, and the prevention focus has a negative impact on resilience. The study helps to understand the relationship between PhoPhiKat and resilience, and the relationship between regulatory focus and resilience, so as to provide reference for future research.
