| 摘要: | 目的：本研究目的分析探討107~110 學年度四強球隊在勝敗隊的攻守數據 (成功進球、不成功進球、無效進攻、進攻區域的次數、抄截快攻、防守籃板快攻、端線快攻、組織戰[系統戰、機遇戰]；防守區域的次數、全場盯人、全場區域、半場盯人、半場區域) 之間的差異性。方法：本研究以影片標記的方式進行，分析對象是以 107~110 學年度臺灣大專院校籃球聯賽 (University Basketball Association, UBA) 公開男一級四強球隊決賽，計107學年度臺灣師大、國立體大、健行科大、義守大學，4場比賽；計108學年度臺灣師大、中州科大、健行科大、輔仁大學，4場比賽；計109學年度政治大學、世新大學、健行科大、義守大學，4場比賽 ; 計110學年度健行科大、政治大學、世新大學、萬能科大，4場比賽，共計有16場比賽，賽事影片來源YouTube裡的SSUtv Sports頻道，下載至電腦後使用Dartfish 10 pro軟體 (Dartfish Inc., Fribourg, Switzerland) 進行影片標記分析。本研究數據資料使用 SPSS for IBM 26.0 版套裝軟體進行資料的統計分析，以獨立樣本t考驗檢定勝敗隊，成功進球、不成功進球、無效進攻、進攻區域的次數、抄截快攻、防守籃板快攻、端線快攻、組織戰[系統戰、機遇戰] ；防守區域的次數、全場盯人、全場區域、半場盯人、半場區域之間的差異性。統計考驗顯著水準訂為 α= 0.05。此外，計算勝隊和敗隊之間差異的效果量。結果：只有成功進球與不成功進球達顯著差異 (p<0.05)，其他未達顯著差異。結論：在進攻方面實際兩分球、三分球和罰球命中率的重要性比其他的攻守數據來的更重要。
Purpose: This study analyzed and explored the difference of the offensive and defensive data on (successful goals, unsuccessful goals, ineffective offenses, the number of offensive areas, steals fast break, defensive rebound fast break, end line fast offensive, organizational warfare [system warfare, opportunity warfare]; the number of defensive areas, full-court man-marking, full-court area, half-court man-marking, half-court area) between the winning and losing teams of the top four teams in the 107-110 academic year. Methods: This research was conducted in the way of film marking. The analysis objects were teams of the top four teams of the university basketball association (UBA) of Taiwan in the 107~110 academic year. Four games among National Taiwan Normal University, National Taiwan Sport University, Chien Hsin University of Science and Technology and I-SHOU University in the 107 academic year, four games among National Taiwan Normal University, Chung Chou University of Science and Technology, Chien Hsin University of Science and Technology and Fu Jen Catholic University in the 108 academic year, four games among National Chengchi University, Shih Hsin University, Chien Hsin University of Science and Technology and I-SHOU University in the 109 academic year, four games among National Chengchi University, Shih Hsin University, Chien Hsin University of Science and Technology and University of Engineering and Technology in the 110 academic year, sixteen games in total were analyzed. The videos of the games were downloaded from YouTube and SSUtv Sports channels. After downloading to the computer, the Dartfish 10 pro software (Dartfish Inc., Fribourg, Switzerland) was used for video tagging analysis. The data of this study were statistically analyzed using the SPSS for IBM version 26.0 software package, and an independent sample t-test was used to determine the difference on successful goals, unsuccessful goals, ineffective offenses, the number of offensive areas, steals fast break, defensive rebound fast break, end line fast offensive, organizational warfare [system warfare, opportunity warfare]; the number of defensive areas, full-court man-marking, full-court area, half-court man-marking, half-court area between the winning and losing teams. The statistical test significance level is set as α= 0.05. In addition, the effect size of the difference between winning and losing teams was calculated. Results: The winning team's performance ratio of successful goals and shots in the offensive area A5 were significantly greater than that of the losing team; the losing team's unsuccessful goals was significantly greater than the winning team (p<0.05). The rest of the variables did not show significant difference. Conclusion: On offense actual 2-point, 3-point and free throw percentages were more important than other offensive and defensive stats. |
