本研究旨在探討二戰後臺灣與韓國的大學入學制度，並以臺灣與韓國現行實施的大學入學管道為中心，探究其各自的特色與發展趨勢，進一步析論兩者之異同，最後得出結論並基於韓國經驗，提出相關建言。在高等教育中，大學是培育國家未來人才的重要學術機構之一，其所帶來之影響和重要性難以言喻。韓國大學入學制度中的學校生活記錄簿早已行之有年，而臺灣因應108課綱實施後，將於111學年度起適用學生學習歷程檔案與其理念相似；因此，韓國的大學入學制度、招生方式、學校生活記錄簿、大學獨立自主性問題等，皆為臺灣可作為參考和學習的借鏡。首先，本研究採用文件分析法與比較研究法，進行臺灣與韓國大學入學制度之比較研究。內文主要探究共含三大部分：制度沿革、現行制度、特色與發展趨勢。研究結論顯示兩者的入學管道類似，但韓國的大學具有較大之自主性；臺灣的學科能力測驗或指定科目考試皆以學科性質為主，韓國的大學修學能力試驗則有專業術科性質之考科；而最具一致性的則為兩國皆以落實並追求大學入學考試的公平性為目標持續地努力。最後，依據研究結論提出相關建議，以期供臺灣的政策實行單位或研究者參考。
The objective of this research is to explore the university entrance system of Taiwan and Korea after World War II. The study seeks to understand their characteristics and future development tendency by analysing the similarities and differences between the two countries. Finally, the author concludes and recommends improvements based on the Korean entrance system.
In higher education, universities are one of the most important academic institutions for nurturing the country's future talents, and their value and importance are indescribable. The high school recording systems regarding the high school records of students in Korean have been conducted for many decades. Separately, the conception is similar to academic portfolio which will be commenced on 2022 under the Curriculum Guidelines of 12-year Basic Education. Therefore, Taiwan’s education system can benefit from taking positive examples from Korea's university entrance system, admission methods, high school system, and the question of independence from universities.
This research adopted a comprehensive comparative research method to analyse the differences in university entrance systems used by Taiwan and Korea. This research focuses on the following main aspects: the history of university entrance systems, current university entrance systems, the characteristics of the university entrance systems, and future development tendencies of the university entrance systems.
The results of this research concluded that the two countries have similar types of admissions, but Korea's universities have more autonomy and independence. The General Scholastic Ability Test and Advanced Subjects Test in Taiwan are belong to academic examination. In the contrast, the technic and skill assessment are applied in the College Scholastic Ability Test of Korea. However, regardless the General Scholastic Ability Test in Taiwan or Korea, both countries concentrate on proving the equal opportunity for students to attend to the university. Finally, the conclusions outlined in this research potentially provides some suggestions for improvements to Taiwan's policy agencies and researchers.
