| 摘要: | 本研究旨在調查大學生的社交能力、依附關係與囤積行為之現況及不同性別之差異情形。本研究採用問卷調查法，以110學年度於台灣各大學就讀的學生為研究樣本；再以人文學院與理工學院為原則立意取樣，共取得518份，其中有效問卷為488份。研究工具，採用「人際溝通量表」、「人際依附風格量表」及「儲存量表（修訂版）」等三項研究工具。資料分析方法，包括描述性統計、卡方檢定、獨立樣本t檢定、多元迴歸等。
本研究的主要發現如下：
1. 大學生囤積行為程度比成人囤積行為程度高出14%、雜亂程度高出13%、過度收集程度高出11%及丟棄困難程度高出18%。
2. 父母親的整體囤積行為程度（包括父親清潔度、父親捨不得丟棄物品程度、父親囤積行為總分；母親清潔度、母親捨不得丟棄物品程度、母親囤積行為）與大學生囤積行為總分之間，具有顯著正相關。
3. 女性大學生在囤積行為各向度（雜亂程度、過度收集、丟棄困難、總分）平均得分上，均比男性大學生顯著的高。
4. 男性在社交能力各向度（社交參與、同理反應、自我表露、情感表達、總分）和囤積行為各向度（雜亂程度、過度收集、丟棄困難、總分），均存在顯著的負相關，甚至是整體樣本中大部分顯著負相關的關鍵性別，女性似乎無明顯相關存在。
5. 在逃避依附傾向與囤積行為各向度（雜亂程度、過度收集、丟棄困難、總分）的相關分析上，男性和女性大學生，均呈現顯著正相關；而且男性相關性比女性相關性更高。
6. 在安全依附傾向與囤積行為各向度（雜亂程度、過度收集、丟棄困難、總分）的相關分析上，男性均呈現出顯著負相關；而女性僅在雜亂程度和整體囤積上出現顯著負相關。
7. 在焦慮依附傾向與囤積行為各向度（雜亂程度、過度收集、丟棄困難、總分）的相關分析上，女性均呈現出顯著正相關；而男性除了雜亂程度無顯著外，其餘均呈顯著正相關。
8. 「性別」、「同理反應」、「逃避依附」、「父親雜亂程度」以及「母親雜亂程度」對於大學生的囤積行為程度具有預測力，總計可以解釋13%的變異量。
The purpose of this paper is to investigate the current status and the gender differences of college students' social competencies, attachments and hoarding behaviors. This paper adopts the questionnaire survey method, taking 2021 academic year students who studying in various universities in Taiwan as the research sample; then taking the humanities and polytechnics as the principle of sampling, a total of 518 are obtained, of which 488 are valid questionnaires. The questionnaire as research tools which composed by "Interpersonal Communication Scale", "Interpersonal Attachment Style Scale" and “Saving Inventory-Revised (Chinese version)”. The data were analyzed by descriptive statistics, chi-square test, independent sample t-test, multiple regression, etc.
The main findings of this paper are as follows:
1. The level of hoarding behavior of college students is 14% higher than that of adults, the level of clutter is 13% higher, the level of excessive acquisition is 11% higher, and the level of difficulty discarding is 18% higher.
2. The parent’s overall hoarding behavior level (including the level of father’s cleanliness, reluctance to discard items, and total score of hoarding behavior; the level of mother’s cleanliness, reluctance to discard items, and total score of hoarding behavior) and college students’ total hoarding behavior score, there is a significant positive correlation.
3. Female college students have significantly higher average scores in all dimensions of hoarding behavior (clutter, excessive acquisition, difficulty discarding, and total score) than male college students.
4. Males have significant negative correlations between social competencies (social participation, empathy reaction, self-disclosure, emotional expression, total score) and hoarding behaviors (clutter, excessive acquisition, difficulty discarding, and total score), also in the overall sample, males are the key gender contribute to significantly negatively correlated, do not seem to be significantly correlated with females.
5. In the analysis of the correlation between the avoidance attachment and the hoarding behavior in all dimensions (clutter, excessive acquisition, difficulty discarding, and total score), males and females college students both show a significant positive correlation; and the male correlation is higher than the females correlation.
6. In the analysis of the correlation between the secure attachment and the hoarding behavior in all dimensions (clutter, excessive acquisition, difficulty discarding, and total score), males all showed a significant negative correlation, while females only showed significant negative correlations in the degree of clutter and overall hoarding behavior.
7. In the analysis of the correlation between anxiety attachment and hoarding behavior in all dimensions (clutter, excessive acquisition, difficulty discarding, and total score), females all showed a significant positive correlation; while males, except for the degree of clutter, the rest were all significantly positive correlation.
8. "Gender", "Empathy Reaction", "Avoidance Attachment", "Father Clutter Degree" and "Mother Clutter Degree" have predictive power for the degree of hoarding behavior of college students, and can explain 13% of the variance in total. |
