1948年9月16日，國共攻守濟南，彼此都視為決戰序幕。濟南決戰，是一場國共雙方在戰前彼此互知對方戰法的戰役，國軍知道共軍將採用圍城打援戰法，共軍知道國軍將採用磁鐵戰法，本文從國共兩軍用兵經過，試圖以帥、將、兵三個層級來比較國共雙方的後方將帥用兵藝術、戰場將領用兵態度與前方士兵用兵行動，探討濟南之戰國軍兵敗、共軍兵勝的關鍵因素，發現國共兩軍的後方將帥用兵藝術不分上下，前方士兵用兵行動難分高低，但戰場將領用兵態度卻有很大差異，以致成為左右濟南戰果的關鍵原因。
On September 16, 1948, the Kuomintang and the Communist Party attacked and defended Jinan, both of which were regarded as the prelude to the decisive battle. The decisive battle in Jinan was a battle where the Kuomintang and the Communist Party knew each other's tactics before the war. The Kuomintang Army knew that the Communist Army would use the method of siege and annihilate the aid. The Communist Army knew that the Kuomintang Army would use the magnet method. This article is based on the use of troops from the Kuomintang and the Communist Party. After trying to compare the military skills of the rear commanders of the Kuomintang and the Communist Party, the attitude of the generals in the battlefield, and the military actions of the soldiers in the front in the three levels of commanders, generals and soldiers, they explored the key factors of the defeat of the Kuomintang and the victory of the Communists in Jinan. The rear generals of the two armies do not distinguish between the upper and lower art of military use. The soldiers in the front cannot distinguish between high and low. However, the attitudes of the generals on the battlefield are very different, which has become the key reason for the success of Jinan.
