| 摘要: | 本人在尚未進入研究所就讀之前，對於脆弱家庭的成因與通報要件不甚清楚，因此為了瞭解國小各校的老師及教育人員對脆弱家庭兒少的認知與敏感度，想藉由此研究了解與提醒學校的老師及教育夥伴們，重視脆弱家庭兒少的問題，並藉由通報能積極的輔導與幫助學生與其家庭，使其能得到最佳的處置與最好的幫助。本研究者研究之目的是在提醒全國教師、校長、主任、組長及各校教職員工們，能發現脆弱家庭並且勇於進行通報，能避免兒少成為受虐兒或是性侵、疏忽……等種種危機的危害，預防勝於治療。
因此本研究旨在探討國小教師在脆弱家庭通報經驗，主要是探究國小教師通報脆弱家庭後，協助脆弱家庭與兒少尋求資源與支援的歷程與過程，本研究採用質化分析，半結構式訪談法，透過訪談、錄音、紀錄、逐字稿與資料分析的方式。
根據訪談的結果，對於通報脆弱家庭後對兒少的影響，大部分都是比較好的、正面的效果與影響，多於不好與負面的效果與影響，如下：
一、 好的、正面的效果與影響有下面幾項：
（一） 兒少經濟上的補助或改善
（二） 兒少課業上的幫助
（三） 兒少心理上的輔導與諮商
（四） 家庭經濟獲得改善
（五） 家庭緊急狀況的急難救助
（六） 兒少行為的改善
（七） 家長行為的改善
二、 不好的、負面的效果與影響有下面幾項：
（一） 通報後，有的家長覺得學校管太多，因而轉學，兒少的心理輔導、課業輔導、經濟資源與經濟援助就此中斷，後續老師也無法得知兒少與家庭的狀況。
（二） 通報後，有的家長乾脆把孩子送到其他地方，例如越南或外婆家…等，老師更無法得知兒少的狀況是否改善。
（三） 通報後，有些家庭的狀況並沒有改善很多，或是家長與兒少的行為、教養方式、親子關係…依舊，沒有多大的改變，因此，兒少與家長的行為或家庭的狀況與問題的改善有限，或是依然存在。
Before I entered the institute, I was not clear about the causes and notification requirements of vulnerable families. Therefore, in order to understand the cognition and sensitivity of teachers and educators of elementary schools in vulnerable families, I want to use this research to understand Teachers and education partners of the school are reminded to pay attention to the problem of young children in fragile families, and to help students and their families to get the best treatment and help by reporting. The purpose of this research is to remind teachers, principals, directors, team leaders, and faculty and staff of schools across the country to find vulnerable families and report them bravely, and to prevent children from becoming abused or sexual assault, negligence, etc. The dangers of crises are better than prevention.
Therefore, this study aims to explore the experience of primary school teachers in reporting to vulnerable families. It is mainly to explore the process and process of assisting vulnerable families and children to seek resources and support after primary school teachers report to vulnerable families. This study uses qualitative analysis and semi-structure Interview method, through interview, recording, recording, verbatim and data analysis.
According to the results of the interviews, most of the impacts on the child population after the notification of vulnerable families are relatively good, positive effects and impacts, rather than bad and negative effects and impacts, as follows:
1. Good and positive effects and influences include the following:
(1) Financial assistance or improvement for children
(2) help in school work
(3) psychological counseling and consultation
(4) The family economy has improved
(5) Emergency assistance for family emergencies
(6) Improvement of child behavior
(7) Improvement of parental behavior
2. The negative and negative effects and influences are as follows:
(1) After the report, some parents felt that the school was under too much management and therefore transferred to school. The psychological counseling, schoolwork counselling, economic resources and financial assistance of the children were interrupted, and the follow-up teachers could not know the situation of the children and the family.
(2) After the report, some parents simply sent their children to other places, such as Vietnam or grandmother's house, etc. The teacher could not know whether the situation of the children was improved. (3) After the report, the situation of some families has not improved a lot, or the behaviors of parents and children, parenting styles, parent-child relationships ... still, there has not been much change. Therefore, children and parents ’behavior or family conditions The improvement of the problem is limited or persists. |
