本計畫旨在比較韓越兩國在《朱子家禮》的影響下自發性產生的《家禮或問》及相關文獻，藉由探討17-18世紀韓儒、19世紀越儒針對《家禮》所提出之「或問」的內容，及其預想的對話對象，深化對《家禮》之東亞影響的理解。《朱子家禮》作為日用倫常的指導書籍，對東亞文化的形成影響極大，尤以土地相連且尊崇儒教的朝鮮和越南尤甚。然而《家禮》在兩地的影響方式、路徑與結果都不相同。前期計畫〈東亞視域中的《朱子家禮》—以韓越傳播特徵與影響比較為中心〉中，申請人書籍史的角度探討《朱子家禮》在韓越的流傳與接受，發現在越南流傳之《家禮》主要底本可能是楊慎之《文公家禮儀節》，可謂相關研究之一大突破。本期計畫擬比較兩國受《朱子家禮》影響產生的在地文本為中心，掌握《朱子家禮》在東亞的定位。相關文獻中，申請人將聚焦於兩國各自產生的《家禮或問》及周邊文獻，藉由比較探討《朱子家禮》在東亞的存在方式。本計畫預計期程為兩年，第一年著重比較韓越《家禮或問》及相關文獻中的論述與對話對象，第二年從韓越儒者對《家禮》論述，梳理《家禮》和韓越在地思想的交涉關係及其相對地位。
As an authoritative manual for ethics in daily life, Chu Shi’s Family Rituals exerted profound impacts on the cultural formation of historical East Asia, particularly Korea and Vietnam. Both kingdoms neighbored Imperial China, and both adopted Confucianism as state orthodoxy. Yet Chu Shi’s Family Rituals entered the two states via different routes, took different forms, and generated different consequences. Hence it is worthwhile conducting a comparative study of Chu Shi’s Family Rituals in Korea and Vietnam, and the study will contribute to not only the scholarship of Chu Shi’s Family Rituals but also the fields of Korean Studies and Vietnamese Studies. In my previous project, I adopted the approach of Book History to examine the transmission and reception of Chu Shi’s Family Rituals in Korea and Vietnam. My research showed that the Vietnamese version of Chu Shi’s Family Ritual might have been based on Yang Shen’s Duke Wen’s Family Rituals during the Ming era, which has been accepted by scholars as being authored by Chiu Jun. Based on this finding, the current project aims to compare Vietnam’s and Korea’s local editions of Chu Shi’s Family Rituals to understand its position in historical East Asia. More specifically, I aim to understand the forms of existence of Chu Shi’s Family Rituals in Korea and Vietnam by comparatively analyzing the content and the imagined interlocutors of various editions of the genre of “Chu Shi’s Family Rituals Q&A” in the two kingdoms. I plan to finish this project in two years. In the first year, I will compare the discourse and interlocutors of extant versions of Vietnamese and Korean genre of “Chu Shi’s Family Rituals Q&A.” I then will examine the relationships between Chu Shi’s Family Rituals on the one hand and Vietnamese and Korean local thoughts on the other as to determine the former’s position in Korea and Vietnam.
