English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 46833/50693 (92%)
造訪人次 : 11855496      線上人數 : 644
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧:
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號",以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋,建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位,可獲得較完整資料
  • 進階搜尋
    主頁登入上傳說明關於CCUR管理 到手機版


    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://irlib.pccu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/44595


    題名: 論警察職權行使法中不確定法律概念之適用
    Study on the Application of Indefinite Legal Concepts in Police Power Exercise Act
    作者: 白曉帆
    貢獻者: 法律學系碩士在職專班
    關鍵詞: 法治國家
    人身自由權
    基本人權
    警察職權行使法
    盤查
    臨檢
    職權行使
    隱私權
    監視器設置
    country under the rule of laws
    basic human rights
    Police Power Exercise Act
    question people
    roadside check
    power exercise
    freedom
    privacy
    surveillance system installation
    日期: 2018
    上傳時間: 2019-06-13 12:47:38 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 中文摘要

    法治國家的核心原則為民主法治,惟我國憲法第23條定有明文:「以上各條列舉之自由權利,除為防止妨礙他人自由、避免緊急危難、維持社會秩序或增進公共利益所必要者外,不得以法律限制之。」為維持社會的秩序,警察權的行使是必然的存在。
    警察人員於行使職權時,往往使用干預的手段以達到行政上或刑事上的目的,此時容易發生與人身自由權與隱私權適用上的問題。若警察人員在行使職權時係依法行政,就符合法治國的法治精神,反之,則有違憲法所保障的基本人權。我國警察職權行使法中有關對人民之盤查與臨檢之相關條文中存在一些不確定法律概念,此容易造成人民在面對警察以不確性之法律概念對其進行干預式的職權行使時,無所適從。
    因此,警察人員依據不確定法律概念進行盤查、臨檢就會有認知上的模糊空間,如此易造成人身自由權的侵犯或是警察人員的消極執勤。因此建議對警察職權行使法中臨檢、盤查之不確定法律概念,另訂定相關作業細則;其次是在有關第10條第1項關於監視器設置的相關規定內,增加為維持交通秩序與處理交通事故及為民服務之公共區域監視器設置要件,祈對我國警察實務有所助益。

    關鍵字:法治國家、人身自由權、基本人權、警察職權行使法、盤查、臨檢、職權行使、隱私權、監視器設置

    Abstract
    The core principle of a country under the rule of laws is democracy. However, according to article 23 of Constitution of the Republic of China: “All the freedoms and rights enumerated in the preceding Articles shall not be restricted by law except by such as may be necessary to prevent infringement upon the freedoms of other persons, to avert an imminent crisis, to maintain social order or to advance public welfare.” To maintain social order, the exercise of police power is necessary.
    When the policemen exercise duties, they usually adopt intervention measures to achieve administrative or criminal purposes and therefore easily cause problem in related with freedoms and privacy. If policemen exercise duties pursuant to laws, it would be satisfactory to the rule of laws. On contrary, it would violate basic human rights protected by the Constitution. Some indefinite legal concepts are existed in question people or roadside check related articles of Police Power Exercise Act. It is easily cause public without knowing whence or whither when policemen exercise intervention duties with indefinite legal concepts.
    Therefore, policemen would have blur in cognition of roadside check based on indefinite legal concepts and easily result in infringement of freedoms or passive duty exercise of policemen. It is suggested to establish enforcement rules regarding the indefinite legal concepts over question people or roadside check otherwise; Next, add requirements of surveillance system installation at public areas for maintain traffic order and traffic accident in paragraph 1 of article 10 regarding the basis of surveillance system installation. It is hoped to be helpful with policemen in practice.

    Keywords: country under the rule of laws, basic human rights, Police Power Exercise Act, question people, roadside check, power exercise, freedom, privacy, surveillance system installation.
    顯示於類別:[法律學系暨法律學研究所] 博碩士論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 描述 大小格式瀏覽次數
    index.html0KbHTML204檢視/開啟


    在CCUR中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋