病人或其家屬對於醫療不良結果或期待落差等等因素，對醫師或醫院提起訴訟請求賠償損害，依據不同訴訟種類與程序，就有關醫療之疏失、醫師或醫院或其履行輔助人相關過失，以及醫療瑕疵與損害間之因果關係等三項構成要件，而有不同舉證責任分攤。訴訟原則上，主要應該由原告為之，由於病人與醫師或醫院間，專業與資訊不對等，訴訟實務應儘量合理正當分配舉證責任，尤其應適度減輕及合理轉換原告舉證負擔。蓋病人可能是因為醫師或醫院之重大醫療疏失而受有損害，於此情形下，則適用舉證責任轉換，但僅限於民事訴訟，刑事訴訟無此問題。
A patient or his family members mayhave filefiled a lawsuit against the doctor or hospital for damages due to, such as unexpected medical results or unsatisfied expectationsexpectation of drop. The three constitutive elements for such litigation that determine the appointed burden of proof include, theaccording to different litigation types of litigation and procedures, negligence in relation to the medical treatment, the fault of the doctor or the hospital or its performing contractual assistant, and the causal relationship between medical fault and damages. There are three constitutive elements, such as the causal relationship between medical expenses and damage, and there are different burdens of proof. As a general rule in litigationIn principle, the plaintiff should have the burden of proofbe responsible for this. Bbecause the professional and informationeducation and experience are not equal between the patient and the doctor or the hospital, and the litigation practice should allocate the burden of proof as reasonable and reasonable as possible. In particular, the burden of the plaintiff's burden of proof should be moderately reduced and reasonably convertedshifted. WhenCovering the patient's damages is may be caused by a major substantial medical malpractice of the doctor or hospital. In this case, the conversion shift of the burden of proof is applicable. However, but it is limited only applicable to civil and not to criminal litigations. lawsuits. Criminal proceedings do not have this problem.
