文化大學機構典藏 CCUR:Item 987654321/41235
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  全文笔数/总笔数 : 46833/50693 (92%)
造访人次 : 11853886      在线人数 : 460
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜寻范围 查询小技巧：
  • 您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号"，以获取较精准的检索结果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜寻，建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段，可获得较完整数据
    •  进阶搜寻
    主页 ‧ 登入 ‧ 上传 ‧ 说明 ‧ 关于CCUR ‧ 管理 到手机版


    jsp.display-item.identifier=請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://irlib.pccu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/41235


    题名: 軍種對思考風格與創造力關係的脈絡效果：以階層線性模式分析
    The Contextual Effect on Relationship between Thinking Style and Creativity among Services: Using Hierarchical Linear Model
    作者: 何森豪
    邱發忠
    贡献者: 心輔系
    关键词: 思考風格
    立法型
    行政型
    司法型
    創造力
    Thinking style
    Legislative
    Executive
    Judicial
    Creativity
    日期: 2011-03
    上传时间: 2018-11-26 14:59:37 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 本研究目的為探究思考風格與創造力間的關係。抽樣尉級軍官568人，以鄭英耀、吳靜吉及黃正鵠(1996)編譯的思考風格量表測量思考風格，而以方瑋(2008)所編製的軍事組織傾向量表測量創造力。本研究將思考風格區分為個體與團體層次，並使用HLM的統計方法俾探究不同層次思考風格與創造力間的關係。首先以單層次的多元迴歸來統計分析，結果發現立法型、行政型及司法型思考風格均可正向預測創造力的表現。之後，進行跨層級的HLM分析後發現，1.軍種層次的思考風格得分無法解釋不同軍種創造力表現。2.在固定軍種層次的思考風格效果後，發現立法與行政二種思考風格可以解釋創造力的表現。3.當將個體層次對個體創造力影響視為隨機變動模式，在軍種間可以存在著變動時，發現了立法型思考風格可以正向預測創造力表現，而司法型思考風格則負向預測創造力表現。而在個體層次上，只有司法型思考風格可以預測創造力的表現。4.軍種層次的思考風格調節了個人層次思考風格與創造力間的關係。本研究結果將可應用於軍事組織，俾提升組織創造力，提升戰備與作戰效能。
    The purpose of this study was to explore relationship between thinking style and creativity. 568 lieutenant officers were asked to complete Thinking Style Scale and Creative Tendency Scale for Military Organization was respectively measured for their thinking styles and creativity. This research distinguished thinking styles from personal and group level. Besides, the relationship between different levels of thing styles and creativity was investigated by using hierarchical linear model (HLM). First, the results analyzed by multiple regression of single level revealed legislative、executive and judicial thinking styles could positively predict creativity. Then, the results analyzed by HLM showed that: (a) Thinking style of service level could not explain creativity of different armed services. (b) Legislative and executive thinking styles could explain creativity after controlling the effect of thinking style of service level. (c) While regarding the influence of personal level on personal creativity as a model of stochastic change, legislative thinking style could positively predict creativity, judicial thinking style negatively predicted creativity. Moreover, judicial thinking style could predict creativity on the personal level. Furthermore, (d) service level of thinking style mediated the relationship of personal level of thinking style and creativity. Those results could be applied to military organization in order to promote organization creativity, combat readiness, and efficiency of battle.
    關聯: 創造學刊 2:1 2011.03[民100.03] 頁79-110
    显示于类别:[心理輔導學系暨心理輔導研究所 ] 期刊論文

    文件中的档案:

    档案 描述 大小格式浏览次数
    index.html0KbHTML31检视/开启


    检视Licence

    在CCUR中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.

    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回馈