大專籃球聯賽男子公開組攻守技術表現比較研究--以文化大學甲一級男籃為例

CCUR > College of Kinesiology and Health > Department of Physical Education > journal articles > Item 987654321/40747

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://irlib.pccu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/40747

Title:	大專籃球聯賽男子公開組攻守技術表現比較研究--以文化大學甲一級男籃為例 The Study of the Offensive and Defensive Records of Chinese Culture University Team of Men's Division I Matches among 2011-12 and 2012-13
Authors:	翁明嘉李清棋李鴻棋
Contributors:	體育學系
Keywords:	進攻能力防守能力得分率 Offensive ability Defensive ability Field goal percentage
Date:	2014-03
Issue Date:	2018-10-08 14:12:17 (UTC+8)
Abstract:	目的：旨在探討100學年度與101學年度文化大學男子甲一級籃球隊之對戰技術表現差異。方法：以大專籃球聯賽官方網站所提供之中國文化大學甲級男籃隊18名登錄球員為研究對象。以100學年與101學年之單項攻守記錄數據作分析。採用描述性統計及獨立樣本t考驗、皮爾森（pearson）的積差相關等統計方法進行分析。結果：101學年度文化男籃隊出手命中得分能力表現皆較100學年度佳，主要表現為全場投籃命中率、每場兩分球命中率、三分球命中率、罰球命中率等，然而犯規次數略有減少，且達顯著差異性（p ＜ .05）。101學年阻攻能力僅與兩分投中數、進攻籃板與防守籃板呈顯著相關性（p ＜ .05）。結論：一、101學年進攻得分能力、進攻籃板、助攻數等均較100學年佳；二、兩季各項攻守紀錄顯著差異性不大，此意謂目前大專籃球聯賽，各校實力皆在伯仲之間。三、101學年文化男籃隊防守能力略有提升，主因在於防守籃板鞏固，內線阻攻能力，防守積極度增強，進而提升抄截數以重拾球權且獲得更多進攻得分的機會。 Purpose: To investigate the relationship and compare the records of the offensive and defensive performance among the Chinese Culture University Team of Men's Division I Matches of 2011-12 and 2012-13 university basketball games (7 preliminary, 6 semifinal, and 2 finals of each two seasons). Methods: The data used the 2011-12 and the 2012-13 university games of the offensive and defensive records retrieved from the official website of University Basketball Association (UBA), which analyzed by Pearson's product-moment correlation and independent-sample t test. The significance level was set at α.05. Variables included 11 skills: field goal, 2-point shot, 3-point shot, free throw, offensive rebound, defensive rebound, assistance, steal, block, foul, and turnover. Results: It found that the field goal percentage, 2-point shot percentage, 3-point shot percentage and free throw percentage in 2012-13 are higher than 2011-12, but offensive rebound, assistance, and turnover increased significantly without showing significant difference (p ＞ .05); however foul decreased significantly (p ＜ .05). The higher relationship was existed among offensive rebound and total rebound, assistance, steal, block, foul, and turnover. Conclusion: Based on the data analysis, the findings can be useful information and applied to basketball coaches.
Relation:	文化體育學刊 17 2014.03[民103.03] 頁37-48 摘要
Appears in Collections:	[Department of Physical Education] journal articles

Files in This Item:

File	Description	Size	Format
index.html		0Kb	HTML	399	View/Open

View Licence

Loading...