文化大學機構典藏 CCUR:Item 987654321/40419
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 46867/50733 (92%)
Visitors : 11878711      Online Users : 714
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://irlib.pccu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/40419


    Title: 當NIKE與LV相遇:運動鞋之品牌類型對態度功能與購買意願關係之干擾效果
    The Moderating Effect of Brand Type on the Relationship of Attitude Function and Consumers' Purchase Intention
    Authors: 陳思宇
    Contributors: 國際貿易學系
    Keywords: 品牌聯名
    運動鞋產業
    態度功能理論
    co-branding
    sports shoes industry
    attitude function theory
    Date: 2018
    Issue Date: 2018-07-31 14:27:27 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 運動鞋產業近年來產生的巨大的變動,除了一般品牌競爭之外,也出現了其他形式的競爭者,包含了奢華品牌向下延伸,進入運動市場,例如:Gucci、Louis Vuitton 等。此外一般運動品牌也開始與異業合作,推出品牌聯名的策略,例如 Adidas by Stella McCartney 等。在這樣一個百花齊放的市場裡,產生了一個值得討論的議題:到底消費者面對這些不同品牌策略時,消費決策是否存在差異?本研究引用「態度功能理論」,同時考慮「享樂功能」、「實用功能」、「價值表達功能」、「社會調整功能」四種構面,透過問卷調查法的方式,希望了解一般品牌、聯名品牌、奢華品牌等不同品牌形式的消費決策中,所存在的異同點。本研究共發放 580 份問卷,針對運動品牌主力族群進行調查。分析方法採用結構方程模型,先透過驗證性因素分析確認信度和效度,再透過路徑分析確認消費行為,同時透過差異性比較,觀察這三種不同品牌策略的消費決策是否存在差異性。研究發現,聯名品牌可著重在「價值表達功能」,奢華品牌較突顯的是「享樂功能」,傳統一般運動品牌則應重「社會調整功能」,而三種品牌形式,均應強調「實用功能」。以上研究結論可提供消費者自我檢視消費策略,也可讓業者針對消費者的需求特性,依不同的目標族群來訂定品牌策略。
    The main purpose of this study is to investigate the antecedent factors of consumers' purchase intention of sports-shoes in three different brand types (i.e., regular brands vs. luxury brand extension vs. co-branding). Borrowing from the theory of attitude functions (social-adjustive, value-expressive, hedonic, utilitarian), we try to explain the determi-nants of sports-shoes consumption. Structural equation modeling (SEM) analysis based on 580 respondents from Taiwan respondents between the age of 16 and 35. Our findings are that the value-expressive function is the main factor for co-branding, the social-ad-justive function plays major role in regular brands, while hedonic function drives the mo-tive of luxury brand extension. All the three brand types must have a look at the utilitarian function. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed, along with future research directions.
    Appears in Collections:[Department of International Trade 7 Graduate Institute of International Trade ] Thesis

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML385View/Open


    All items in CCUR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback