本研究運用影片觀察法，針對2003年全運會及2002年亞運會，男子競技體操單槓項目決賽共16位選手所實施完成的整套動作內容，進行詳細紀錄與專項分析，獲得以下結論。
一、我國選手所完成的D、E級難度動作，大部份均是運屑Endo動作加以變化完成，整套動作內容重複性極高。
二、亞運會選手完成的D、E、SE級動作與連結動作的次數及加分值兩部份，皆遠多於全運會選手，而且兩者有相當大的距。。
三、亞運會及全運會選手皆針對評分規則修改的趨勢，將較不容易發生失誤的第E類型近槓動作連結實施，從中獲得較穩定的連結加分。
四、亞運會選手完成的脫手騰空再握動作類型多變且難度較高，我國選手完成的脫手騰空再握動作難度較低且動作類型單調。
The purpose of this study, by making use of video-watching approach, aims to compare the high bar routine composed and performed by male artistic gymnasts in 2002 Asia Game and 2003 National Game. In conclusion, the findings of this study are as follows:
Following the Code of Points that is lately revised, all gymnasts compose their kip by applying type-Ⅱ elements to have a high starting value.
Taiwanese gymnasts all are obviously not quite familiar with lowering shoulder and leg beat action in Giant Swing, and that would cause serious consequences to develop release-aerial-regrasp skills, if the gymnasts fail to make use of Giant swing and the vertical force of high bar.
Gymnasts in Asia Game compose and perform a certain amount of particular release-aerial-regrasp skills in their high bar routine; Taiwanese gymnasts, only monotonous elements derived from Endo.
The release-aerial-regrasp skills composed and performed by gymnasts in Asia Game vary in high degree of difficulty, while Taiwanese gymnasts only indulge in easier, monotonous ones.
