自2000年文化資產保存法修正並新增「歷史建築」作為新的文化資產類別至今，全台灣已累計有1359筆完成登錄的歷史建築，其數量不僅遠超過古蹟、聚落、遺址與文化景觀其他四個空間類文化資產，更逐年在快速增加當中。然而，由於歷史建築在登錄、修復、維護與管理上均不如古蹟受到較嚴謹的規範限制，其保存與再利用到底該用什麼標準衡量也逐漸成為爭論的焦點，據此本研究將結合空間型構與行為地圖，研究分析民眾造訪歷史建築的觀感與經驗，試圖從使用者的角度反思近年來在台北掀起的歷史建築再利用熱潮。
具體本研究將以歷史建築密度最高的台北市迪化街為田野，以保安捌肆、米糧桁與URS27W三棟分屬不同使用類型的歷史建築作為研究對象，藉由分類與分項式的橫向比較研究，指認出影響使用者於歷史建築中的行為與活動之空間元素，並據此歸納歷史建築活化使用之設計原則。
Since the amendment of Cultural Heritage Preservation Act correction in 2000 and the addition of “Historical Building” as a new category of Cultural Heritage, there has been 1359 recorded historical buildings. The number is not only far more than all the other categories (such as historic monuments, settlement, ruins and cultural landscape), but it continues to increase year by year. However, because the protection of historical buildings are not as restrictive as the monuments in restoration and management, there is rising debate over the standard of protection. Thus, this paper aims to apply people’s examines perception on visiting experience. Especially through a combined method of space syntax and behavioral mapping, the primary goal is to reflect on the recent boom of historical building reuse.
Specifically, this study will take the highest density of historical buildings in Dihua Street, Taipei City, as a field, taking the Boan 84 Space、the rice truss and the URS27W three historic buildings of different usage types as the research objects. By classification and sub-type The horizontal comparison study identifies the spatial elements that affect users' recognition of historic buildings and summarizes the design principles for the activation and reuse of historical buildings.
