「南向」與「西進」政策的比較分析

CCUR > College of International Studies and Foreign Languages > English Program of Global Business > periodical articles > Item 987654321/38108

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://irlib.pccu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/38108

Title:	「南向」與「西進」政策的比較分析
Authors:	杜震華
Contributors:	全商系
Keywords:	南向西進大陸東南亞投資條件雙向政策 Going-southward Going-westward South-east asia Mainland China Investment environment Weighted average
Date:	1994-06
Issue Date:	2017-08-31 14:20:40 (UTC+8)
Abstract:	「南向」政策最近被政府用來降低廠商「西進」的熱度。「南向」與「西進」的優劣勢成為各界議論之焦點。本文首先介紹大陸和東南亞之基本經濟情勢。其次，就這兩大地區一些較重要的投資條件加以分析，再詳析南向和西進因勞動和土地使用價格下降之成本效果。接著，基於現有的文獻，以及最近蒐集之資訊，對這兩大投資地區就各種投資條件加以評估。再以一套權數系統，將評估結果加權平均，得出大陸和東南亞綜合投資條件之明確結論。基本上確認對中小企業而言，大陸投資環境較優。對大企業而言，東南亞則較為優異。並據此提出「雙向」政策建議。 Recently, the policy of "Going-Sowthward", i.e., investing in South-East Asia, has been adopted by the government to retard Taiwanese firms' "Going-West-ward" wave. The advantages and disadvantages of "Going-Southward" and "Going-Westward" have been widely discussed. This article evaluates the investment conditions of Mainland China and South-East Asia in details, based on the existing literature and data collected from South- East Asian countries. A weighting system is further developed to make a weighted average for both areas, in order to reach a clear conclusion. Basically, for a large firm, the investment environment of Mainland China is worse than South-East Asia, while for a small and medium-sized firm, Mainland China is much better. This article recommends a balanced investment policy and makes some practical suggestions to the policy makers.
Relation:	中山學術論叢 12 民83.06 頁103-142
Appears in Collections:	[English Program of Global Business] periodical articles

Files in This Item:

File	Description	Size	Format
index.html		0Kb	HTML	178	View/Open

View Licence

Loading...