|
English
|
正體中文
|
简体中文
|
全文筆數/總筆數 : 46833/50693 (92%)
造訪人次 : 11865977
線上人數 : 315
|
|
|
資料載入中.....
|
請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件:
https://irlib.pccu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/36001
|
題名: | 國會資訊行為之研究:國會調查權與國會資訊公開之革新與展望 Study on Parliament Information Behavior: the Reform and Envision of Legislative Investigation Power and Parliamentary Information Disclosure |
作者: | 李寧修 |
貢獻者: | 法律學系 |
日期: | 2017 |
上傳時間: | 2017-04-20 14:50:06 (UTC+8) |
摘要: | 權力分立乃支配國家組織與權限分配之重要憲法基本原則,國會作為人民的代表,自應克 盡監督其他國家權力之職責,然而,國會行使職權之過程中,若未能獲取充分、完整之資訊, 其制衡之能量與效果恐怕無法發揮,因此,賦予國會資料調閱與調查權,係確保其得有效監 督其他國家權力之必要前提。 另,國會於行使職權之同時,亦匯聚並累積大量之資訊,而其中不乏與人民權益密切相關、 甚至關鍵性地左右立法走向者,作為人民之公僕,國會之行為除透過議會自律,亦應接受外 部適度地監督與檢驗,避免「黑箱」、「密室」之譏,然而,人民是否得無礙地取得其足以監 督、評價國會行為之相關資訊,以型塑負責任之公共意見,進一步與國會理性交流對話,在 強調由下而上之參與式民主的今日,益顯重要。 基此,本研究擬以權力分立原則與歐盟所倡議之透明原則出發,探討國會資訊行為之憲法 上意義,並將國會之資訊行為劃分為「國會調查權」與「國會資訊公開」兩個層面,分別觀 察其理論與法制之發展脈絡,並借鏡德國與歐盟之規範與實踐,嘗試就當前國會所面臨之困 境與挑戰,提出觀察與建議,期供作未來國會革新之參考。 Separation of powers is the fundamental constitutional principle that governs the foundation of nation organizations and distribution of authority. Parliament as the representative of people naturally should fulfill its duty to oversee the government authorities. However, if the parliament cannot receive full and complete information when exercising its duty, then the effect of control cannot play its role. Therefore, in order to keep the Parliament well functioned, it is necessary to give the parliament the power to access information and investigate. When the Parliament is fulfilling its duty, it will withhold and accumulate ample information, which some are closely related to the rights of people, or even heavily influencing legislation outcome. As the public servant of people, not only should the Parliament conduct be self-disciplined, but also the Parliament should accept proper external examination and supervision, in order to avoid backroom deals mockery. Moreover, whether civilians can obtain sufficient information to oversee and comment on the Parliaments work is fairly important. It is the key point of building up a reliable public opinion and further start a dialogue between civilians and the Parliament. This also reflects that the democracy nowadays emphasizes on the participation from bottom up. Hence, this study will use separation of power principle and the transparency principle underlined by European Union to discuss the meaning of information behavior through constitutional perspective. Further, two-tier discussion of “Legislative Investigation Right”, and “Parliamentary Information Disclosure” will be discussed individually in theory and though legal system practice. Also, by further reference to German and EU,s regulation and practice, this study will try to provide observation note and suggestion on the dilemma and challenge which the Legislative Yuan face nowadays in Taiwan, in hope to provide possible further solutions for future reformation. |
顯示於類別: | [法律學系暨法律學研究所] 研究計畫
|
文件中的檔案:
檔案 |
描述 |
大小 | 格式 | 瀏覽次數 |
index.html | | 0Kb | HTML | 444 | 檢視/開啟 |
|
在CCUR中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.
|