亞太地區智慧綠建築評估系統比較分析

CCUR > College of Environmental Planning & Bioresources > College of Environmental Design > Department of Architecture and Urban Design & Graduate Institute of Architecture and Urban Planning > thesis > Item 987654321/35798

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://irlib.pccu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/35798

Title:	亞太地區智慧綠建築評估系統比較分析 Asia Pacific Intelligent Green Building Assesment Comparative Analysis
Authors:	周祐安
Contributors:	建築及都市設計學系
Keywords:	綠建築智慧建築
Date:	2017
Issue Date:	2017-04-07 14:35:08 (UTC+8)
Abstract:	因人類長時期大量開發及建設所產生的CO2，已對於地球造成嚴重的影響，而根據CO2排放量調查所示，營造業所排放之CO2為各產業中之首，隨著環保意識抬頭，營造業為呼應對於環境保護職責，於建築設計時也逐漸轉型成以降低環境破壞及低能耗為主之智慧建築與綠建築。台灣為亞太地區少數擁有智慧及綠建築評估系統的國家，期望透過研讀及瞭解各國智慧及綠建築評估系統之精神、指標內容、認證流程及獎勵制度，並透過比較各國評估項目基準、項目得分、指標權重、獎勵政策及相關制度，來提升我國智慧及綠建築相關產業之水平。本研究方法以比較分析為主，首先透過分析各國智慧及綠建築指標項目之定性定量，得知各國其評估方法主要主要以定性評估；再依據各國智慧及綠建築指標特性作分類，分類如下：智慧建築：『基礎設施類』、『管理類』、『安全類』、『健康類』、『節能類』綠建築: 『基地類』、『材料類』、『水資源類』、『能源類』及特別項『CO2減量』最後設定並依照選取原則之規定，將可進行基準比較之項目挑選出來進行比較分析。根據比較分析結果，亞太地區其智慧建築及綠建築評估項目，會因國情不同指標權重、基準詳細度及得分皆有不同，智慧建築方面香港其評估基準較著重效益，基礎設施評估項目較少，台灣則是著重基礎設施、各系統與設備之功能，效益部分較少著墨。綠建築方面台灣針對基地物理環境之評估較少，如：基地風場、基地噪音、基地交通。未來若能借鏡上述他國優點，便能持續提升我國智慧綠建築之產業水平。 A great quantity of humanity long terms development and the carbon dioxide(CO2 ) that cause from construction have had a serious impact on earth. According to the researches of CO2 emissions, the amount that exhaust from construction industry head the list among others. With the rising awareness of environmental protection, the construction industries are calling for protecting duties. Therefore, when confronting architectural design, it will gradually transform into Intelligent and Green Building which aims at low-energy consumption and reduction of environmental destruction. Taiwan is one of the few countries in the Asia-Pacific region with Intelligent and Green Building assessment systems. Expecting to improve the status of the industries not only through the study and realizing of their spirits , indicators contents , certification processes and reward systems but also via comparing each country with different assessment projects that mentioned above. The research will mainly based on comparative analysis. Initially analyze the standards of intelligent and green building from each nation ,then classify according to their index which shows below: Intelligent Building: "Infrastructure" ," Management" , "Security , "Health" and "Energy Saving" Green Building: "Base" ," Materials" ,"Water" ,"Energy" and special one "Reductions of CO2" The results show that the evaluation differ owing to national conditions. In terms of Intelligent Building assessment, Hong Kong put more emphasis on the benefits instead of infrastructures while Taiwan focus on the other hand. There is little evaluation of base physical environment in Taiwan when it comes to Green Building. Such as base wind field, base noise, and base traffic. If we can learn from other countries, we will continue to enhance the level of this industry.
Appears in Collections:	[Department of Architecture and Urban Design & Graduate Institute of Architecture and Urban Planning ] thesis

Files in This Item:

File	Description	Size	Format
index.html		0Kb	HTML	385	View/Open

View Licence

Loading...