| 摘要: | 近年來拜自動型電子感測科技的發展，駕駛訓練方式從以往一對一的教練模式，逐漸導入道路模擬的自動型駕訓設備。駕駛訓練的技能影響駕駛人員上路後的交通安全。以往傳統依靠教練人員的授課模式，本研究希望能從駕訓模式的探討，了解駕訓受訪者的學習需求以及駕訓班的經營策略，檢討目前之駕駛訓練方式，建構一個創新且符合時代需求的駕駛訓練方式。
本研究以需求層次理論作為理論基礎，以新北市輔大駕訓班學員為受訪者實例出發探討駕訓班受訪者在課程熟悉度及常見錯誤，對汽車駕訓場智慧型駕駛執照訓練方式滿意度及相關訓練內容偏好種類進行問卷調查，問卷設計乃針對駕訓班場地受訪者進行，針對一、基本資料，二、駕駛訓練場地各課目難易程度之調查，及三、駕駛訓練場導入智慧型駕訓模式之需求調查。並以交叉分析方法討論受訪者在年齡、課程熟悉度及課程規範與設備需求之比較差異。
問卷調查分析結果顯示，受訪者族群對課程操作困難類型分為一、視覺忽略，二、技術失誤及三、反應判斷時間不足三種特徵。在課程規範提醒以較不熟悉之平行路邊停車、倒車入庫、曲線進退、換檔穩定及上下坡道之課程規範動作提醒智慧化有認同，且不在論年齡層與在課程熟悉度方面皆對「是否拒絕顯示」設備類型之智慧化導入皆呈現需求。
據此結果，本研究對「是否拒絕顯示」設備類型備類型功能定義檢討，試將與年齡層與課程特徵問題相互比較討論，推論出該項目為一個整合系統之設備功能，受訪者在年齡層面以學習行車駕駛狀態下對於環境資訊提供參考輔助有著重視；在課程特徵問題檢討方面，從視覺面論述智慧化設備應導入應具有距離測量之感應器或對應標誌或前後方物件距離訊息功能，技術面應具有對行車狀態資訊蒐集並回饋設施場所訊息之功能，時間判斷需要類似可感測特定設備位置感應裝置做為嚮導功用。簡言之，綜合受訪者在年齡及課程上對「是否拒絕顯示」之看法，本研究認為駕訓班場地導入智慧化可從系統整合功能發展導入檢討精進。
In recent years thanks to the development of automatic electronic sensing technology, driving training methods from the past one-on-one coaching model, and gradually into the road simulation of automatic driving training equipment. The skills of driving training affect the traffic safety of the driver on the road. In the past, relying on the teaching mode of coaches, this study hopes to understand the learning needs of drivers and the management strategies of drivers, and review the current driving training methods to construct an innovative and in line with the times. Demand for driving training methods.
In this study, based on the theory of demand hierarchy as the theoretical basis, this paper explores the familiarity and common mistakes of the driving class in the driving training class. Questionnaire survey was carried out on the basis of the questionnaire survey, the basic information, the survey on the difficulty level of each subject in the driving training venues, and the third, the driving training field Import the demand investigation of intelligent driving mode. The cross-analysis method was used to discuss the differences in age, course familiarity, curriculum requirements and equipment requirements.
The results of questionnaire survey showed that the types of difficulties were divided into three categories: visual neglect, technical error and lack of response time. In the course of the standard to remind the less familiar parallel to the roadside parking, reversing storage, curve advance and retreat, shift stability and up and down the course of the standard action to remind the wisdom of recognition, and not on the age and familiarity in the course of both Whether or not to deny display smart import of device types renders requirements.
Based on this result, this study makes a review of the definition of whether to refuse to display the device type, and compares it with age and course characteristics. The results show that the project is an integrated system device function. In the learning of driving conditions, it has attached great importance to the reference information of environmental information. In the review of the problem of curriculum features, the intelligent devices should introduce distance sensors or distance markers or front- The technology should have the function of collecting the information of the driving state information and feedbacking the facility place information, and the time judgment needs to be similar to the sensing device of the specific equipment as the guide function. In short, the comprehensive respondents in the age and curriculum on the "whether to refuse to display" view, this study suggests that the driving training venues into the wisdom of the system integration capabilities from the introduction of sophisticated review. |
