行政程序之三面關係之比較法考察--以作成行政處分程序為中心

CCUR > College of Law > Department of Law & Graduate Institute of Law > journal articles > Item 987654321/34140

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://irlib.pccu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/34140

Title:	行政程序之三面關係之比較法考察--以作成行政處分程序為中心 The Comparative Analysis of the Laws to Intervention in Administrative Proceeding
Authors:	王萱琳
Contributors:	法律系
Keywords:	行政程序第三者效力行政處分侵害處分行政參加聽證陳述意見第三者利害關係人參加適格原告適格 Administrative procedure Proceeding The third party License Permit Interested person Hearing Intervention Participation Standing
Date:	2005-03
Issue Date:	2016-09-13 10:48:43 (UTC+8)
Abstract:	所謂「第三者致力行政處分」一般是指對相對人之授益處分同時產生對第三人負擔之效果。主張權利受損害之第三人雖非處分相對人，但其卻因相對人獲得該處分而受到負面之影響，因此，是否付予其權利利益救濟的機會與管道?又如何付予之?方能達到國民權利利益救濟之實效性，在面臨行政紛爭多樣化與國民權利意思高漲之今日，實成為刻不容緩之課題。本稿擬以探討利害關條人在行政程序中的定位，作為強調行政透明化、民眾參與行政決策日愈普及之研究的一環。並以比較法的方式，借用重視行政程序之日本法的法解釋與分析，期待對我國的法規範與運用上，能更進一步地獲得落實。 Generally speaking, when the trouble between the parties and agencies results, sometimes it will bring to the third parties. So when the agencies permit or renewal, the third parties will seek for intervening that “ministrativeprocedure of permit or renewal to reject that admit. If the agency does not admit the request of the third parties it will seek an appeal of his interests are aggrieved or adversely affected by the decision of the agency granting any application for a license of permit or renewal. In Japanese law, especially the third parties interests are not always considered. It is the same with Taiwan. So the problem of intervention(or participation)of the third parties will be dealt with each enactment. We wi1l research under comparing “Administrative Procedure Act” of Japan and Taiwan, how it deals with the problem with the third parties.
Relation:	玄奘管理學報 2:2 民94.03 頁139-161
Appears in Collections:	[Department of Law & Graduate Institute of Law ] journal articles

Files in This Item:

File	Description	Size	Format
index.html		0Kb	HTML	128	View/Open

View Licence

Loading...