| 摘要: | 舞蹈不僅僅只是舞蹈，它反映著該國家不同時期之文化水平、宗教意識與生活型態。由於筆者出身舞蹈科班，加上對韓國傳統舞蹈感興趣，便想朝兩國傳統舞蹈比較進行深入研究。目前有關中韓傳統舞蹈比較的論文並不多見，尚未發現兩國舞蹈基本動作與體態的比較文獻，也未有中韓鼓舞與劍舞比較的論文。撰寫過程中，筆者還發現參考文獻有一些錯誤需要指正。因此筆者認為兩國舞蹈基本動作與代表性舞蹈之比較，均有研究的價值與意義。
筆者欲藉此研究，將兩國舞蹈上身與下身肢體動作運用加以統整比較。藉由整理兩國舞蹈發展史的方式來探討兩國之間樂舞交流之歷史淵源。深入探究樂器皆為鼓，為何韓國對於鼓〈북〉和鼓〈고〉的定義不同？期許本論文研究結果，能提供欲針對兩國傳統舞蹈進行深入研究之學者參考使用。筆者將研究範圍限定在袖舞、劍舞與鼓舞上，乃因兩國袖舞在外型上極為相似，且皆具有宗教意義。兩國劍舞就發展的歷史年代來看，筆者推測韓國劍舞可能是受到中韓樂舞交流影響從中國流傳到韓國。至於眾多鼓類樂器中為何會挑選中國攻鼓子與珍島鼓舞進行比較，是因為攻鼓子與韓國舞蹈同屬西涼樂，因此兩者之間是否有什麼關聯，值得深入探討。
大體而言，中國古典舞的整體技巧與肢體運用都比韓國傳統舞蹈多，韓國舞蹈則是動作細節變化上比中國古典舞多，這一點與中國舞蹈動中有靜，韓國舞蹈靜中有動的特色相呼應。中國古典舞在身體各部位的運用較為平均，動作大氣；而韓國傳統舞蹈著重於身體曲線的表達，動作內斂。兩國舞蹈形式呈現明顯對比，加上歷史文化背景的影響，終使兩國傳統舞蹈在歷經幾千年的交流與朝代交替後，各自發展出不一樣的民族特色與風采。
Dance is not just dance. It reflects the cultural level, religious consciousness and life patterns of the country at different phases of each dynasty during past thousand years. Due to the author learned Chinese traditional dance for 13 years and is interested in Korean traditional dance, and wants to do a comparative study of Chinese traditional dance and Korean traditional dance.
Currently, it is hard to find references about the comparative study of Chinese traditional dance and Korean traditional dance. Moreover, there are no theses comparing these two dances posture and position, sword dance and drum dance. During this research, the author found some theses had some mistake need to be correct. In regard to a comparative study of Chinese traditional dance and Korean traditional dance in basic posture and position, and sword dance and drum dance, these two dances both have the significant value and meaning.
The purpose of this research is to compare with upper and lower body movements in Chinese traditional dance and Korean traditional dance, and reviewing the History of the dance as music accompaniment in Chinese and Korean traditional culture. In order to identify why Korean people have different definition in drum(북) and drum(고). The author defines the scope of the sleeve dance has similar body movement and religious significance, sword dance and drum dance have similar body movement. According to the historical development of sword dance, the author surmised that, Korea sword dance could be influenced by Chinese music accompaniment. Regarding Chinese attack drum dance and Jindo drum dance both are Hsi Liang Yüeh music, the author select these two dances as contrast subjects to study the correlation between Chinese attack drum dance and Jindo drum dance.
Generally speaking, Chinese traditional dance has more techniques and body movements then Korean traditional dance. However, compare with Chinese traditional dance, Korean traditional dance has more variational details in body movements. In the aspect of body movement, Chinese traditional dance is moving in a static, and Korean traditional dance is static in action. In Chinese traditional dance, the upper and lower body movements are in balance. But in Korean traditional dance, the upper body movements are more than lower body movements. Chinese traditional dance is gorgeous and magnificent, Korean traditional dance is focused on the expression of the body curve. The dance forms between these two dances presented in sharp contrast. They both influenced by their history and cultural. After thousands years of cultural exchange in Chinese traditional dance and Korean traditional dance, they developed to their own national character and style. |
