論陳建《學蔀通辨》之貢獻與失誤

CCUR > College of Liberal Arts > Philosophy Department and Graduate School > journal articles > Item 987654321/30956

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://irlib.pccu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/30956

Title:	論陳建《學蔀通辨》之貢獻與失誤 Some Observations on Chen Chien's the Clarification of the Veiled Theories (Hsueh-Pu-Tung-Pien): It's Merits and Flaws
Authors:	蔡龍九 Tsai, Lung-Chiu
Contributors:	哲學系
Keywords:	學蔀通辨道一編朱子晚年定論朱陸異同朱陸調和 The Clarification of the Veiled Theories Hsueh-Pu-Tung-Pien The Later Chu Hsi: The Conclusion Chu-Tzu-Wan-Nien-Ting-Lun The Way Is One Tao-I-Pien the similarities and dissimilarities between Chu and Lu reconciliation and combination of Chu and Lu
Date:	2008-10
Issue Date:	2015-11-16 10:17:31 (UTC+8)
Abstract:	本文探究《學蔀通辨》對於《朱子晚年定論》、《道一編》等傾向於朱陸調和之作品，所提出的批評內容。分別探討《學蔀通辨》中的合理處與失誤處，並說明理由，以及此書批評效果。最後，衡定《學蔀通辨》，並總結此書的貢獻及失誤，依此反省「朱陸異同」之爭論，是否有更清晰的處理方式。 This paper aims to explore Chen Chien's The Clarification of the Veiled Theories (Hsueh-Pu-Tung-Pien), specifically his comments on Wang Yang-ming's The Later Chu Hsi: The Conclusion (Chu-Tzu-Wan-Nien-Ting-Lun) and Cheng Min-cheng's The Way Is One(Tao-I-Pien), which, according to Chen, suffer from the same fault of reconciling and combining Chu Hsi and Lu Hsiang-shan. I will begin with a thorough investigation on Chen's comments, sorting out as well as explaining the book's merits and flaws, and weigh its intended effect. I endeavor to reevaluate this book in the hope of bring out a more constructive perspective on the issues concerning the reflections on the similarities and dissimilarities between Chu and Lu.
Relation:	國立臺灣大學哲學論評； 36期 (2008 / 10 / 01) ， P149 - 191
Appears in Collections:	[Philosophy Department and Graduate School] journal articles

Files in This Item:

File	Description	Size	Format
index.html		0Kb	HTML	385	View/Open

View Licence

Loading...