同志向家人現身前後的互動脈絡與家庭氣氛變化

文化大學機構典藏 CCUR > 教育學院 > 心理輔導學系暨心理輔導研究所 > 博碩士論文 > Item 987654321/29907

請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://irlib.pccu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/29907

題名:	同志向家人現身前後的互動脈絡與家庭氣氛變化 The Interaction and Family Atmosphere Between Homosexual Adults and Their Families During the Pre- and Post- Coming Out Period
作者:	蔡仁傑
貢獻者:	心理輔導學系
關鍵詞:	同志重複現身家庭現身歷程家庭氣氛敘說分析 homosexual coming out again familial coming out process family atmosphere narrative analysis
日期:	2015-06
上傳時間:	2015-07-09 15:14:21 (UTC+8)
摘要:	本研究旨在探討同志子女向家庭成員現身前後的親子關係、手足互動脈絡，與其對於家庭氣氛變化之影響；以及同志子女向家人現身的歷程內涵。本研究訪談對象為包含年齡介於20-30歲的男、女同志子女、同志父母及同志手足在內之全體核心家庭成員各一組。男同志家庭成員總計訪談時數計24小時，女同志家庭成員總計訪談時數計32小時。本研究以敘說分析方法分析個別家庭成員訪談資料，將所有家庭成員的敘說分析結果整合成完整流暢的同志家庭現身故事，並予以詮釋分析，以個案研究形式呈現本研究結果。綜合本研究中的兩個同志家庭在同志子女現身前後的互動經驗，其具體內涵包括：一、同志現身前後的親子互動脈絡內涵包含：（一）從隱藏同志身分到現身 1. 同志子女性別氣質不符性別刻板印象易引起父母懷疑其性傾向； 2. 同志子女的現身籌碼影響其現身的時機與策略； 3. 現身後親子溝通陷入僵局，同志子女進入重複現身階段。（二）中介者協助處理關係衝突 1. 中介者之功能可分為直接介入關係、情緒支持及提供專業資訊； 2. 率先修復的親子關係能調節另一方親子關係衝突； 3. 父母因拉攏同盟關係失敗、中介者的持續調節與父母因拒絕子女的同志身分的罪疚感等因素的交互作用，驅動父母主動修復親子關係的欲望。（三）親子關係衝突的修復 1. 同志子女生活能力及心智成熟度的展現有助於提升父母對同志子女的信心； 2. 修復欲望驅使父母展現修復親子關係的主動性； 3. 異性戀手足彌補同志父母的失落感。二、同志現身前後的手足互動脈絡內涵包含：（一）手足間的信任關係影響同志向手足現身的意願；（二）手足關係的親密程度影響手足扮演中介者時的積極性；（三）手足扮演中介者之功能主要為提供同志情緒支持及提供父母專業資訊。三、同志子女現身前後的家庭氣氛變化內涵包含：（一）積極正向的家人互動關係，有助於家庭次系統之間的相互調節；（二）父母教養方式及同志人格特質之交互作用影響家庭氣氛變化；（三）同志家庭建立向社會現身與對話的共識。四、同志子女的家庭現身歷程內涵：（一）隱藏階段：同志子女覺察並認同同志身分、累積內在與外在現身籌碼；（二）現身階段：同志子女評估現身策略、現身後親子溝通陷入僵局、同志子女向父母重複現身並建立手足同盟；（三）磨合階段：同志子女與支持其同志身分的雙親之一建立次系統同盟關係；該同盟關係之雙親之一以及其他中介者，介入調節親子關係衝突與僵局；（四）修復階段：親子雙方主動展現溝通意願、同志子女與家人關係獲得修復，同志家庭建立向社會現身與對話的共識。本研究最後針對以上研究發現進行討論，並針對未來後續研究的發展、同志家庭及助人者分別提出建議。 The purposes of this study were to understand the interaction and family atmosphere between homosexual adults and their families during the pre- and post- coming out period, and to reveal the key elements during the familial coming out process. In this study, the researcher collected data from two homosexual children (a gay and a lesbian from two different families) aged 20-30 and their core family members, including their parents and siblings. The duration of the interviews with the gay child and his core family members amounted to 24 hours, while the duration of the interviews with the lesbian child and her core family members amounted to 32 hours. The results were analyzed by the narrative analysis method with which the researcher integrated each part of the transcripts from the interview with every family member into two family stories, as the results are shown as follows: A. The interaction between the homosexual children and their parents: (A) From closeting to coming out 1. The homosexual children’s sexualities were likely to be doubted by their parents if their personal traits do not fit into the stereotypes of their genders. 2. The strategies and occasions for the homosexual children to come out to their parents depended on what kind of inner and external resources they were able to gain and how soon they were able to gain them. 3. The parent-child communications quickly reached deadlocks after the homosexual children’s coming out, which required the homosexual children to come out again. (B) Mediators helping to fix the conflicting relationships 1. The mediator’s main functions were intervening in the conflicting relationship, providing emotional support for the homosexual child and providing specialized information for the other parent. 2. In both families, the first repaired parent-child relationship enabled one of the parents to become the mediator of the other still-conflicting parent-child relationship. 3. The parents developed the desire for reparation due to failing to forge alliances, the intervention of the mediators, and the guilty feelings evoked from refusing to accept their own homosexual children. (C) Reparation of the conflicting relationships 1. The homosexual children’s independence and mental maturity helped increase their parents’ trust in them. 2. The parents’ desire for reparation prompted them to repair the parent-child relationships actively. 3. The existence of heterosexual siblings helped the parents deal with disappointment. B. The interaction between the homosexual children and their siblings: (A) Trustfulness in sibling relationships had an impact on the homosexuals’ will to come out to their siblings. (B) Degrees of intimacy in sibling relationships correlated with siblings’ degrees of activeness while being mediators. (C) Siblings’ main functions while being mediators were providing emotional support for the homosexual siblings and providing specialized information for their parents. C. The changes in atmosphere in both families: (A) Positive interactions between the family members were conducive to moderating conflicting subsystems in their families. (B) The interactions of parenting styles with homosexuals’ personal traits formed various patterns of family atmosphere. (C) Both families established consensuses for the degrees of coming out to the society. D. Key elements during the familial coming out process: (A) Closet period: Homosexual children accumulate inner and external resources that would make them able to cope with the threats and negative emotions after coming out to their family members, particularly their parents. (B) Coming out period: Homosexual’s evaluation of coming out strategies, parent-child relationships reaching deadlocks, the homosexuals coming out again, and siblings forging alliances. (C) Compromising period: Homosexual children forge alliances with one of the parents who support them, which enabled the parents alongside with other mediators to intervene in the still-conflicting parent-child relationships. (D) Repairing period: The conflicting parent-child relationships repair gradually due to actively showing the will to communicate from both sides, and the families then establish consensuses for the degrees of coming out to the society. Based upon the above-mentioned results, discussions and suggesting were presented.
顯示於類別:	[心理輔導學系暨心理輔導研究所 ] 博碩士論文

文件中的檔案:

檔案	描述	大小	格式	瀏覽次數
index.html		0Kb	HTML	534	檢視/開啟

檢視Licence

在CCUR中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.

資料載入中.....