文化大學機構典藏 CCUR:Item 987654321/29329
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 46833/50693 (92%)
Visitors : 11847907      Online Users : 473
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://irlib.pccu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/29329


    Title: 馬令、陸游二家《南唐書》之比較
    The Contrast between Mă Lìng's and Lù Yóu's "The History of South Tang"
    Authors: 簡彥姈
    Chien, Yen-Ling
    Contributors: 中國文化大學中文學報
    Keywords: 馬令
    陸游
    《南唐書》
    本紀
    列傳
    Mă Lìng
    Lù Yóu
    "The History of South Tang"
    Běn-Zhuàn
    Liè-Zhuàn
    Date: 2012-10-01
    Issue Date: 2015-01-28 14:58:49 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本文旨在探討宋代馬令、陸游二家《南唐書》之比較,要點有四:一、記三主:馬氏為金陵三主作「書」五卷,陸氏則為立「本紀」三卷。後者將三主列入《南唐紀》,即承認南唐為合法政權。二、錄臣民:馬氏作「列傳」二十四卷,以載南唐臣民。陸書則有「列傳」十五卷,包括「單傳」、「合傳」、「類傳」、「附傳」和「四夷傳」;前四類用以記人物之生平,「四夷傳」是為外族所作傳記。三、譜世系:馬書有〈建國譜〉及〈世裔譜〉;陸書則無此例。四、論史事:馬書論贊之繁瑣,令人生厭。陸書僅十一篇,以嚴謹、客觀著稱。要言之,足證陸書優於馬書,但後者亦具保存史料之功,故二書始終並行於世,相輔相成。
    This paper examines the contrast between Mă Lìng's And Lù Yóu's ”The History of South Tang” in the Sòng dynasty. Mr. Mă's and Mr. Lù's ”The History of South Tang” are distinguished by the following features: 1. Mr. Mă wrote 5 volumes of Shū for recording the monarchal life stories. Mr. Lù wrote Běn-Zhuàn in 3 volumes. His so-called Běn-Zhuàn was biographies of emperors in ancient Chinese history books. 2. Mr. Mă wrote 24 volumes of Liè-Zhuàn for recording the people's life stories. There are 15 volumes of Liè-Zhuàn in Mr. Lù's ”The History of South Tang”. It includes Dān-Zhuàn, Hé-Zhuàn, Lèi-Zhuàn, Fù-Zhuàn and Sì-Yí-Zhuàn in his book. The former ones are biographies of people, but the latter one is biographies of the minority nationality. 3. Mr. Mă wrote ”Jiàn-Guó Pŭ” and ”Shì-Yì Pŭ” in his book. But there is no sample in Mr. Lù's ”The History of South Tang”. 4. There are a lot of commentaries in Mr. Mă's book. They are very minute and complicated. Mr. Lù made 11 comments on the history of South Tang. He made an impersonal comment on each historical incident. All these features exemplify Mr. Lù's ”The History of South Tang” is better than Mr. Mă's one. But the latter preserved our historical materials. For this reason, Mr. Mă's and Mr. Lù's ”The History of South Tang” exist simultaneously.
    Relation: 中國文化大學中文學報 ; 25 期 (2012 / 10 / 01) , P67 - 83
    Appears in Collections:[Graduate Institute of Chinese Literature] academic journal

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML130View/Open


    All items in CCUR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback