清代閻若璩撰作《尚書古文疏證》，其書在流傳過程中，除今常見成書之八卷本外，尚有撰作時所編定的一卷本、四卷本、五卷本之別。與閻若璩同時的馮景，著有《淮南子洪保》一書，凡二卷，分別就《尚書古文疏證》的第四與第五兩卷給予評論，從中可知閻若璩在撰作《尚書古文疏證》時，與清初學界互動的情形，也可進一步觀察其書撰作期間，閻若璩辨偽論點被接受與被質疑的不同面向。
In early Qing Dynasty, Yan Rou-qu’s ＂Shang Shu Gu Wen Shu Zheng＂ in the writing process had different volumes to been edited. Feng Jing’s ＂Huai Nan＂ Zi Hong Bao had commented on volume fourth and fifth of ＂Shang Shu Gu Wen Shu Zheng＂. In addition to accepting Yan’s critical study of Gu Wen Shang Shu (The Book of History in the Ancient Script), Feng pointed out the deficient discourse of Yan’s textual research. This article aims to survey and analysis of relation between Feng’s comment and Yan’s critical study of ＂Gu Wen Shang Shu＂.
