文化大學機構典藏 CCUR:Item 987654321/28879
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  全文笔数/总笔数 : 46867/50733 (92%)
造访人次 : 11889851      在线人数 : 604
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜寻范围 查询小技巧:
  • 您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号",以获取较精准的检索结果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜寻,建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段,可获得较完整数据
  • 进阶搜寻
    主页登入上传说明关于CCUR管理 到手机版


    jsp.display-item.identifier=請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://irlib.pccu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/28879


    题名: 現代建築
    The Metaphysics of 20th Century Architecture
    作者: 林建業
    贡献者: 華岡工程學報
    日期: 1988-07
    上传时间: 2014-11-10 15:17:09 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 20th Century has been an age teeming with exuberance and iconoclasm. The European architects were initiative forces to creat new architecture and fought courageously, bitterly against sclerosized historical styles of the past. Among them, until 1937, 1938, when two commanding figures-walter Gropius, Mies Van der Rohe fled Nazi Germany to the U.S.A. Thence-forth Modern Architecture Versus traditional Architecture flourished in that promising land, like miracles suddenly became true. Its potency was so great which overwhelmed all conservative establishments and was soon accepted world wide, and swollen in every direction became the mainstream of Architecture utill roughly around 1960. There were other streams first gargling from subterranean and then flew like broad rivers into the ocean, those are Organic Architecture and its derivatives, contextualism, neo-rationalism, pluralism, eclectism and mannerism etc. In this democratic, knowledge explosive, industrialized affluent societies, building activities have been moving fast with unprecedented speed and vigor. Architects of younger generation moved like rambunctions wild horses dashed their ways toward new frontiers. People get apprehensive and consternated. It is precisely this situation that press met to write this book. (now only a portion of three main themes under the tittle of Rationalism) my intention would be the elucidation of what are the underlying philosophy of these movements, from 1930's up to now, Idealogically and Metaphysically. Is Architecture a social Art or an autonomous discipline. Did the zeigeist be duely reflected, how values be properly upheld. What is the significance of architectural formal languages. Did habitability of our cities be enhanced. Finally I would like to point out the way that would put the diversified polemic thoughts into a synthetical whole.
    關聯: 華岡工程學報 ; 4 期 (1988 / 07 / 01) , P187 - 207
    显示于类别:[工學院] 學報-華岡工程學報

    文件中的档案:

    档案 描述 大小格式浏览次数
    index.html0KbHTML130检视/开启


    在CCUR中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.


    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回馈