| 摘要: | 本論文主要研究亞洲金融風暴當時韓國政府所採取的經濟因應對策，以及經濟因應對策造成的影響。因為亞洲金融風暴前和亞洲金融風暴後，韓國的貧富差距有很大的差異，所以另外在第四章，特別提到韓國目前貧富差異的狀況，以及朴槿惠新政府針對現在韓國所面臨的貧富差距、經濟民生狀況等各項問題等所採取的對策。
第一章首先說明為什麼會以《韓國政府因應金融風暴對策之研究》為題目，在緒論當中透過表一、表二、表三的數據來說明，在第一節當中說明本論文的動機與目的，第二節則說明本論文的研究方法和限制。
第二章則說明亞洲金融風暴時，韓國當時的經濟狀況的變化，以及透過所提供的數據，來了解韓國當時面臨金融風暴時，為何會資金周轉不靈，以及亞洲金融風暴發生的當時，對韓國造成的影響。
第三章首先說明到韓國一開始面臨亞洲金融風暴的情況，在還沒向IMF申請援助之前，韓國政府所採取的各式各樣的政策應對，甚至還有由韓國國民一起團結起來所把每個人的財產或貴重的東西募集的《募金運動》，但即使如此，也還是無法籌措到足夠的資金，來面臨金融風暴所帶來的損失，所以之後不得不向IMF申請資金紓困，在第一節當中首先提到除了IMF以外，和其他各個國家借予韓國紓困的金額分析，之後提到得到紓困金後IMF對韓國所開出的條件之分析，及帶給韓國的好影響和壞影響，第二節的內容主要是分析當時接受IMF資金紓困後，在韓國所推動的四大經濟因應對策，分別是金融改革、企業改革、勞動改革、公共改革等四大部分開始進行重整。第三節主要說明韓國經過四大經濟因應對策改革後，韓國整體經濟的轉換。
第四章首先透過亞洲經融風暴前與後的韓國人民所得，來看貧富差距的狀況，第二節則透過個人的所得數據和的企業所得數據，證實所得幾乎集中在所得前10%的階層，第三節透過國際間貧富差距的數據，來說明韓國貧富差距的狀況，第四節則說明在2013年當選韓國的第一任女總統，朴槿惠女士如何帶領新政府來解決目前國家遇到的貧富差距、民生經濟等各樣問題。
最後在第五章結論當中，本人以自己的觀點，站在台灣目前所面臨的經濟狀況，探討韓國政府因著在一九九七年亞洲金融風暴時所採取的經濟因應對策，進而影響到現在的優缺點，以此作總結，希望作為以後國家在經濟發展上可以參考的部份。
There are some studies mainly focus on Asian Financial Crisis, the economical adopting tragedies the Korean Government carrying out, and causing of the effect which resulted from the tragedies at that time.
Because there are a big differences on the disparity between poor and rich in Korean before Asian Financial Crisis and after that time. Moreover, in Chapter four, I mentioned particularly the conditions of the disparity in Korea, and the politics that the new governmental authority by Pu Gin-Huei carried out on the disparity between poor and rich, and the conditions of people’s economics.
In Chapter one, I illustrate why do I order ‘‘The study of economical adopting tragedies Korean Government carrying out’’ to be my topic.
In the summary, I will illustrate the motivation and the goal of the essay. In part two, I write the studying methods and the limits.
In Chapter two, firstly, I mention the economical changes of Korea at the time--- Asian Financial Crisis; secondly, by the data, I analyze why it can’t turn over the funds at the time of Korean Government.
In Chapter three, at first, I illustrate the conditions of Korea facing the Asian Financial Crisis, how Korean Government adopted many kinds of policies, even the ‘‘Rising Money Movement’’ by Korea united people’s capital and valuable things before the Government hadn’t applied for any helps to IMF. However, it still couldn’t raise enough funds to face the loss from the Financial Crisis. As a result, Korea Government had to apply for funds to IMF afterwards. In part one, I mention besides IMF and the price analysis of other receiving the funds of financial relief, IMF provided some qualifications to the Government, and it brought the good impact and the bad one to Korea. In part two, it mainly analyze that after receiving the funds from IMF, there are some tragedies of four economic reforms by the Government, parting to four financial ones, Financial Reform, Enterprise Reform, Labor Reform, and Public Reform to start to reset. In part three, I mention that after experiencing four economic reforms, the whole economic changes Korea.
The Chapter four, firstly, I discuss the conditions of disparity by GDP in Korea before the Asian Financial Crisis and after that time. In part two, it proves the percentage of gains almost centralizes to the class of the income located at 10% by the data of personal income and the one of EIT. In part three, I illustrate the condition of the disparity in Korea by the data of International disparity between poor and rich. In part four, I illustrate how the first female president--- Pu Gin Huei led the new Government to solve different kinds of problems, such as the disparity between poor and rich, and the economics etc.
At last, in Chapter five--- conclusion, I conclude in 1997 the Asian Financial Crisis, Korean Government carried out the economical tragedies which impacts four advantages and shortcomings nowadays by my own viewpoint to stand on the condition Taiwan is facing for economic. I hope that this easy could be a part for references on the national economical development. |
