「休閒參與者及休閒活動契合」之相關研究，僅Melamed, Meir, and Samson (1995)提出「休閒一致性」之概念與契合度相似地，此概念強調人格特質在選擇休閒活動時所扮演之角色，仍忽略二者間的契合本質。有鑑於此，本研究擬透過文獻回顧來提出休閒契合度概念。本研究探討休閒契合度(供給與需要契合度、能力與要求契合度)、幸福感(精神福祉、自尊、倦怠感、焦慮)及休閒滿意度、心流體驗之間關係。本研究採取立意抽樣法，並以日常生活中有從事休閒活動者為研究對象，調查地點為大安森林公園，有效樣本為485份。
本研究結果包括：(一)本研究將休閒契合度定義為休閒參與者與休閒活動兩者基本特徵的契合程度，包含「能力與要求契合度」及「供給與需要契合度」，前者意指休閒參與者的能力條件，符合休閒活動的要求；後者意指休閒活動所提供的休閒利益，符合休閒參與者的需要。(二)以LISREL分析各研究變項之因果關係：(1)休閒契合度與休閒滿意度、心流體驗呈現顯著正向關係。(2)休閒滿意度與精神福祉、自尊呈現顯著正向關係，然而與倦怠感、焦慮呈現顯著負向關係。(3)心流體驗與自尊呈現正向關係，但與焦慮呈現顯著負向關係。(4)休閒滿意度、心流體驗在休閒契合度與幸福感之間為一中介變數。
The studies of participants’ ability or condition was conforming to the requirements of leisure activities on ‘fit of leisure participants and leisure activities’ were still rare. In 1995, Melamed, Meir and Samon had advocated a very similar concept named ‘leisure congruence’, which argued that the individual’s personality play an important role while choosing the types of leisure activities. In spite of their efforts, the ‘leisure congruence’ ignores the fact that the imbalanced nature between the individual’s ability and leisure activity. This study plans to build the concept of leisure fit through literature review. The study introduced the relationships between leisure fit (supplies-needs fit, abilities-requirement fit), well-being (spiritual well-being, self-esteem, burnout and anxiety), leisure satisfaction and flow experience. This study adopted a purposive sampling and selected the leisure activity participants in ordinary life as samples and chose Da’an Forest Park as the survey place. The effecting samples are 485.
The results of this study are including: (I) “leisure fit” is defined as the match characteristics between the leisure participants and the leisure activities, including “abilities-requirement fit” and “supplies-needs fit”. “Abilities-requirement fit” can be defined as leisure participant has the abilities required to meet the requirements of their leisure activities. “Supplies-needs fit” can be defined as the leisure benefits provided by leisure activities satisfy leisure participant’s needs. (II) After analyzing the consequence of various study variables with LISREL software, it indicates that: (1) leisure fit is positively significantly relationship with leisure satisfaction and flow experience. (2) Leisure satisfaction is positively significantly relationship with spiritual well-being and self-esteem and has a negative relationship with burnout and anxiety. (3) Flow experience is positively significantly relationship with self-esteem and negatively significantly relationship with anxiety. (4) Leisure satisfaction and flow experience play a mediating role between leisure fit and well-being.
