| 摘要: | 桌球雙打項目是我國亞運奪牌希望之一，但目前我國現階段的雙打新組合卻是表現不甚理想，是以本研究乃針對蔣澎龍與莊智淵的雙打現階段各項綜合技術表現進行探討，期能利用科學化有系統的搜集其比賽的各項技戰術資料加以分析，以提昇我國桌球雙打實力，達亞運會奪金之目的。本研究收集蔣澎龍與莊智淵的雙打近年來參加國際比賽的技戰術資料，依據桌球基本技術特徵，將主要技術分為發球搶攻、接發球搶攻、搓攻、推攻、對攻等綜合技術項目，以觀看錄影帶方式利用桌球比賽記錄表，從實戰角度來觀察登錄各項攻守技術能力資料。所得資料利用PC個人電腦、SPSS For Windows統計軟體及灰色關聯度分析法進行統計分析，各項統計考驗顯著水準均定為α=.05。其結果如下：一、蔣澎龍與莊智淵之雙打組合在現階段的各項綜合技術表現上：在發球搶攻得分的技術使用是以正手側發球、正手側拉攻及反手側撥攻等技術項目較高；而其正手側搓球、正手側被搶及反手側被搶等技術是失分最多的項目。在接發球搶攻得分的技術使用是以正手側搓球、正手側撥攻與正手側拉攻等技術項目較高；而其正手側撥攻、正手側拉攻及正手側搓球等技術是失分最多的項目。在搓攻階段最主要的得分技術是以正手側拉攻、正手側搓球與反手側搓球等技術項目較高；而其正手側拉攻、反手側拉攻及反手側被搶等技術是失分最多的項目。在推攻階段最主要的得分技術是以正手側拉攻、反手側拉攻與反手側對推等技術項目較高；而其正手側拉攻、反手側對推及反手側拉攻等技術是失分最多的項目。在對攻階段最主要的得分技術是以反手側對拉與正手側對攻等技術項目較高；而其正手側對攻及反手側對拉等技術是失分最多的項目。二、通過關聯分析得知對蔣澎龍與莊智淵在雙打比賽時影響成績表現的技術項目順序分別是正手側發球搶攻(X1)、正手側接發球搶攻(X3)、反手側推攻(X8)、正手側搓攻(X5)、反手側接發球搶攻(X4)、反手側搓攻(X6)、正手側推攻(X7)、反手側發球搶攻(X2)、正手側對攻(X9)、反手側對攻(X10)等。由此可知蔣澎龍與莊智淵的雙打比賽在發球後的第三板正手側積極搶攻表現與第四板接發球後的正手側積極搶攻表現，影響其比賽成績甚巨，故日後應有計畫地加以鞏固提升，而在正手側對攻及反手側對攻上表現欠佳，故日後應該做針對性改善才能突破現階段的技術瓶頸。三、從本研究中兩人在各階段之技術統計表現可以看出，莊智淵的表現似乎較好。但是雙打是兩人共同之比賽，默契與戰術都是非常重要的，唯有兩人互相扶持，發揮各自特長並隬補彼此缺點，才能在雙打比賽中有所發揮，獲得比賽勝利。
Double of table tennis is one of the hopes that we can win the Asian game. But now in Taiwan, our new double of table tennis’s performance is not well. The study is going to research for Chiang peng-lung and Chuan Chih-Yuan integrated technical performances in present stage. We hope to find the overcoming strategy by using scientific ways, and collect the integrated analysis of each technical and tactics to improve strength of double of table tennis in Taiwan and achieve the purpose of getting the gold. The research collect Chiang peng-lung and Chuan Chih-Yuan’s technical and tactics join the international games recently. Based on table tennis fundamental technical characteristic, we could divide the main techniques into serve attack phase, double cutting phase, pushing phase, and mutual attack phase. We watch the video to record every kind of technique form the table tennis record sheet. From a point of view to actual combat and enter the data of each attack and defend technique ability, the receive data use the PC computer, SPSS for Windows soft of histogram and analyze by using the gray connection analysis. Set each the histogram test outstanding level α=0.5. The results are: (1) Chiang peng-lung and Chuan Chih-Yuan integrated technical performances in present stage: The highest scores in the item of serve attack phase are forehand side service, forehand side drive and backhand side poke attack. But forehand side double cut, forehand side attached and backhand side attacked ones lose more scores in the serve attack phase technique. The highest scores in the item of receive attack phase are forehand side double cut, forehand side poke attack and forehand side drive. But forehand side poke attack, forehand side drive and forehand side double cut lose more scores in the receive attack phase technique. In the double cut phase, forehand side drive phase, backhand side double cut, and backhand side drive gains more scores: But forehand/backhand side drive and backhand side push also lose much scores. In pushing phase, forehand/backhand side push, backhand side drive gains more scores .But forehand side drive, backhand side push and backhand side drive lose more scores. In mutual attack phase, backhand side drive and forehand side mutual attack gains more scores. But forehand side mutual attack and backhand drive lose many score. (2) By stepwise regression analysis, we could find the technical items which affect the score performances in present games are forehand side serve attack phase(X1), forehand side receive attack phase(X3), backhand side pushing phase (X8), forehand side double cutting phase(X5), backhand side receive attack phase (X4), backhand side double cutting phase(X6), forehand side pushing phase(X7), backhand side serve attack phase(X2), forehand side mutual attack phase (X9), backhand side mutual attack phase(X10). So we can know the actively performance of third board’s serve attack phase and forth board’s receive attack phase affects Chiang peng-lung and Chuan Chih-Yuan game results a lot. We need to enhance and keep in a planned way. Performances on forehand/backhand side mutual attack phase are not good. We have to make improve to break through the choke point.(3) From this study, we can find in each technical & tactics performance. Chuan Chih-Yuan is better than Chiang peng-lung. But double of table tennis is two person’s game, tacit agreement and tactics are very important. Only they help each other, developing individual special skills and supplementing shortcoming. That is, they can bring talent in double table tennis and win the game. |
