文化大學機構典藏 CCUR:Item 987654321/24353
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  全文笔数/总笔数 : 46833/50693 (92%)
造访人次 : 11847122      在线人数 : 350
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜寻范围 查询小技巧：
  • 您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号"，以获取较精准的检索结果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜寻，建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段，可获得较完整数据
    •  进阶搜寻
    主页 ‧ 登入 ‧ 上传 ‧ 说明 ‧ 关于CCUR ‧ 管理 到手机版


    jsp.display-item.identifier=請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://irlib.pccu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/24353


    题名: 吐蕃名分秩序的建立及其演變－以唐宋時期為中心
    作者: 林冠群
    贡献者: 史學系
    日期: 2012-2013
    上传时间: 2013-02-27 11:34:46 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 本計畫擬以名分觀念看吐蕃由部落聯盟制演進至王朝體制，吐蕃如何建構與宣示王室統治權的正當性，如何安排社會高低位階，如何建立社會秩序等。自從引進外來宗教佛教以後，王室如何試圖以新宗教的意識型態，改變君臣分際，並試圖以新立僧相，改變官場生態，進而試圖改變傳統名分秩序，因而導致王朝崩解。至宋代時期，漢史料所載之吐蕃，其名分秩序的重建，是否一仍唐代吐蕃的舊軌，抑或另起爐灶？凡此皆為本計畫關切的重點。本計畫取材以唐代吐蕃時期所遺留的文獻為主，諸如敦煌古藏文卷子、吐蕃碑銘等，並輔以唐宋時期的漢文史料對吐蕃的記載等，希冀對上述所提出的諸多問題，透過前述名分觀念分析所蒐得之史料，得到解答，並以之為例，檢視唐宋接續期間，吐蕃名分觀念是否為繼承式的演進，抑或改頭換面？
    This project has detail analysis that ancient Tibetan political system derived from tribal alliance to a kingdom, how did Tibet construct and declare his royal governance legitimacy, how to arrange social status, and how to set up social orders. Ever since introduce the foreign religion－Buddhism, how did the royalty applied the ideology of new religion changing the distinction between monarch, and try to appoint a monk minister, attempt to transform the official system, and reform the traditional naming hierarchy and authority classification, it has caused the collapse of Tibetan dynasty. The author has concerns about the reconstruction Tibetan traditional naming hierarchy and authority classification under Chinese documentary during Sung dynasty, whether if it follows the Tang’s old ways or a fresh start? This project has based on the remains Tibetan documentary during Tang’s period, such as《Account Tibetan Documents from Dunhuang (shog dril yig rigs)》, Tibetan manuscripts(rdo ring), and compares with the Chinese archival data and historical remains during Tang and Sung period. The author tries to answer questions above through analysis the naming hierarchy and authority classification written in historical material, and take it as an example reconsiders after the Tang and Sung period, did the Tibetan naming hierarchy and authority classification system has inherited evolving or makeover?
    显示于类别:[史學系暨研究所] 研究計畫

    文件中的档案:

    档案 描述 大小格式浏览次数
    index.html0KbHTML566检视/开启


    检视Licence

    在CCUR中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.

    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回馈