偵查中羈押被告供述之證據能力研究

CCUR > College of Law > Department of Law & Graduate Institute of Law > thesis > Item 987654321/20048

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://irlib.pccu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/20048

Title:	偵查中羈押被告供述之證據能力研究
Authors:	王廷興
Contributors:	法律學研究所碩士在職專班
Keywords:	偵查中羈押被告供述之證據能力
Date:	2010
Issue Date:	2011-10-31 14:03:03 (UTC+8)
Abstract:	本論文主要目的，係希望建構一套兼顧「社會科學所發展建立的法律價值體系」，與「自然科學客觀、具體的驗證步驟」特色的「證據能力驗證模式」，且易於操作，並可彈性應用於具體個案的判斷上。惟本次研究的範圍，僅限縮於「供述證據絕對證據排除驗證模式」之建構及其操作及運用。驗證模式的基礎理論，係以林鈺雄(Yu-Hsiung Lin)教授主張之證據排除三階段審查理論為基石，整合了王兆鵬(Jaw-Perng Wang)教授有關自白與毒樹果實之精闢論述，及林俊益(Jyun-Yi Lin)教授的實務論證，同時大量引用實務判決，以補充理論之應然面，從而建構了本模式的論述依據。「供述證據絕對證據排除驗證模式」的基本價值：是為保障人權，嚇阻國家司法機關違法取供，回歸科學辦案，以物證為主的偵查模式，故以嚴格之自白法則及自白與毒樹果實理論，作為驗證平台。本論文第三章有詳細之論述。為了達成「理論」與「實務」的聯接，故採「驗證體系」及「驗證步驟」二階段的結構方式，逐步的建構驗證模式的架構。在實務運用上，本模式也依據二階段的順序，逐步驗證證據之證據能力: 一.選擇適用驗證體系二.選擇適用驗證步驟，其驗證模式的操作，於第三章、第四章亦有詳細之論述。同時為了證明模式之可操作性，於第四章，除了檢討台灣現行「押人逼供」的文化及其成因外，更以實例作為「驗證模式運用，操作的測試」，以證明模式的可操作性。自然本論文，也提出一些結論及建議，期望能根絕「三不」的「押人逼供」文化。其中，最重要的建議係建立「外部有效、獨立、即時的監督及評鑑機制」。詳細的論述及建議，詳第五章之論述。這只是初步的嘗試，「驗證體系」及「驗證步驟」只係一種思維模式，它的價值必須經由具體個案的實踐，才能顯現，因此盼望讀者，可因應個案之特性，任意變更其「驗證的準則及內容」，或以增、修、補的方式，自行創立更實用的體系及步驟，這正是本研究最真誠的希望。 Abstract The main purpose of this research tries to construct a significant evidence ability verified model that includes both law-value system developed by sociology and objective、 specific test process proposed by Science, besides it must be easy to operate and can be applied to judge the individual case flexibly. For the time limited, the content of this research focus on the study of the construction、operation and application of「Confession-evidence Absolute Exclusive Verified Model」(CAEVM). The theory base of CAEVM derives from the theory of「3 Stages Inspection Exclusive Rule」that asserted by professor Yu-Hsiung Lin, and also integrates 「Confession of Rule and the Fruit of the Poisonous Tree Doctrine」provided by professor Jaw-Perng Wang and some practical experiences proposed by professor Jyun-Yi Lin , simultaneously introduces many Taiwan Supreme Court Verdicts ,with the aim to accommodate and enforce the above theory. The fundamental value of CAEVM is to protect human right and deter the national judicial-authorities to take the confession-evidence by illegal methods and strongly wish that the judicial-authorities can return to the model of scientific investigation. So this research asserts firmly to apply strict 「Confessions of Rule and the Fruit of the Poisonous Tree Doctrine」on CAEVM, it is presented in chapter 3. In the chapter 4, it not only reviews the culture of taking evidence by custody which is prevailing around Taiwan now, but also manage the CAVEM by case study to verify the capability of it’s practical operation. For achieving the connection between theory and practice, this research adopts so called two stage’s process:「verified system」and 「verified process」in sequence to build the structure of CAVEM, it also easy to apply to the practical operation in the same way, more about the detail statement showed in chapter 3 and 4. As usually, this research will propose some conclusions and recommendations which want the Taiwan government can organize an outside effective、 real-time monitoring system to review and monitor the effort of judicial-authorities. it is expressed in chapter 5. For the「verified system」and 「verified process」is only a kind of thinking way, it’s value must be practiced by specific individual case and then might be explored and realized， so that this research urges the reader to change the verified criteria and contend of CAVEM to meet the necessity of individual case. It is the enthusiastic expectation of this research that the reader can create more new practical model to solve your specific case effectively and accurately.
Appears in Collections:	[Department of Law & Graduate Institute of Law ] thesis

Files in This Item:

File	Description	Size	Format
index.html		0Kb	HTML	22236	View/Open
index.html		0Kb	HTML	22086	View/Open

Loading...